Stress distribution on dentin-cement-post interface varying root canal and glass fiber post diameters. A three-dimensional finite element analysis based on micro-CT data

Lazari, Priscilla Cardoso; Oliveira, Rodrigo Caldeira Nunes de; Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera; Almeida, Érika Oliveira de; Freitas, Amílcar Chagas; Kina, Sidney; Rocha, Eduardo Passos

doi:10.1590/1679-775720130203

Cited by 39 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 28 publications

(53 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Despite all clinical success achieved with the use of intraradicular posts, one disadvantage of this system is the additional removal of sound tissue needed for fitting the post into the root canal; additionally, this procedure was revealed to affect the overall biomechanical behavior of the restored teeth. Alternatively, other restorative approaches have been suggested, including but not limited to the well-known endocrown restorations [1][2][3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Lithium Disilicate Crowns Retained with Fiber Posts Compared to Lithium Disilicate and Cerasmart Endocrowns: In Vitro Study

Al-shibri¹,

Elguindy²

2017

Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of endocrowns and glass fiber postretained crowns on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars made of different ceramics materials. Materials and Methods:Thirty sound maxillary premolars were endodontically treated. They were randomly assigned into 3 groups (n=10), in which, teeth were prepared to receive all-ceramic restorations. GP: fiber post and resin core and ferrule with all-ceramic (IPS E-max CAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent) conventional crown. GE: Endocrown with butt joint finish line design made of (IPS E-max CAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent). GC: Endocrown with butt joint finish line design made of hybrid nanoceramic (CERASMART, GC Dental, USA). The lithium disilicate (IPS E-max press, Ivoclar-Vivadent) and hybrid nanoceramic (CERASMART, GC Dental, USA) all-ceramic restorations were made by CAD/CAM system (CEREC MC XL SW 4.0) and adhesively cemented with dual-cure resin cement (BisCem Bisco, Inc, USA). Specimens were mounted in a universal testing machine (Model 3345; Instron Industrial Products, Norwood, MA, USA). Each specimen was loaded to failure at a crosshead speed of 5.0 mm / min. Mode of failure was also examined. Data were analyzed using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc significance difference tests. Differences were considered significant at P<0.05. Results:One way ANOVA test showed that group (GC) recorded statistically significant (p<0.05) highest mean value (1522.64 N) followed by group (GP) (1301.34 N) then group (GE) (725.73 N). Group (GE) recorded the lowest statistically significant (p<0.05) mean value (725.73±137.89 N). Pair-wise Tukey's post-hoc test showed nonsignificant (P>0.05) difference between GP and GC groups. Conclusions:Within the limitations of this study, all fracture resistance loads obtained in this study were far beyond the maximum masticatory forces and the presence of hybrid nanoceramic increased the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with endocrown than those restored with lithium disilicate endocrowns, in failure mode hybrid nanoceramic showed favorable fracture pattern than lithium disilicate.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Lithium Disilicate Crowns Retained with Fiber Posts Compared to Lithium Disilicate and Cerasmart Endocrowns: In Vitro Study

Al-shibri¹,

Elguindy²

2017

Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, further studies should be performed to evaluate the fatigue factors to better understand the effectiveness and durability of the FRC posts and to evaluate the behavior of the posts cemented in roots. That type of analysis may help verifying whether the structural defects of the posts affect their long-term use in the clinical setting as well as the stress distribution (24).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Correlation between the Mechanical Properties and Structural Characteristics of Different Fiber Posts Systems

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength and flexural modulus of different fiber-reinforcement composite (FRC) posts and determine the correlation between mechanical properties and structural characteristics. Eleven brands of fiber posts were analyzed (n=10): Exacto Cônico (Angelus), DT Light SL (VDW), RelyX Fiber Post (3M-Espe), Glassix Radiopaque (Nordim), Para Post Fiber White (Coltène), FRC Postec Plus (Ivoclar), Aestheti-Plus Post (Bisco), Superpost Cônico Estriado (Superdont), Superpost Ultrafine (Superdont), Reforpost (Angelus), and White Post DC (FGM). The posts were loaded in three-point bending test to calculate the flexural strength and flexural modulus using a mechanical testing machine (EMIC 2000 DL) at 0.5 mm/min. Data were submitted to oneway ANOVA and Scott-Knot test (p<0.05). The cross-sections of the posts were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Correlation between the mechanical properties and each of the structural variables was calculated by Pearson's correlation coefficients (p<0.05). The flexural strength values ranged from 493 to 835 MPa and were directly correlated with the fiber/matrix ratio (p=0.011). The flexural modulus ranged from 4500 to 8824 MPa and was inversely correlated with the number of fibers per mm 2 of post (p<0.001). It was concluded that the structural characteristics significantly affected the properties of the FRC posts. The structural characteristic and mechanical properties of fiber glass posts are manufacture-dependent. A linear correlation between flexural strength and fiber/matrix ratio, as well as the flexural modulus and the amount of fiber was found. C o r r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n t h e M e c h a n i c a l P r o p e r t i e s a n d S t r u c t u r a l C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f Different Fiber Posts Systems

show abstract

“…Stress levels differ by 21% between the model with the highest stress and the model with the lowest stress [130]. This behavior was due to stress transfer from structures with a lower elastic modulus to structures with a higher elastic modulus, which favors stress concentration on the post (i.e.…”

Section: The Elastic Modulus Of the Glass Fiber Post And Of The Resinmentioning

confidence: 99%

Test methods for bond strength of glass fiber posts to dentin: A review

Santos

Carlo

Barros

2016

The Journal of Adhesion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, a review of the test methods for bond strength of glass fiber posts to dentin is presented. The main variables that influence the bond strength tests are related to substrate, to specimen properties, specimen preparation and test methodology. The impact of these variables on the test outcome is analyzed. The search was performed on studies published between 2007 and 2015. Most of the tests carried out, in the literature, were the push-out (75%), pull-out (13%) and microtensile (11,9%) tests, showing an inversion compared to the results found in studies published between 2005 and 2010, when push-out test was used in a proportion of 2% and microtensile test in a proportion of 67%. The push-out test emerged as a practical tool for evaluating the interfacial shear strength between fiber post and root canal walls.Fiber posts have been widely used in endodontically treated teeth in the last years. One of the advantages of using fiber posts is the use of adhesive bonding technique, which requires minimal intervention on the dentin surface. In addition, fiber posts have an elastic modulus similar to dentin, resulting in more homogeneous stress distribution along the root canal system. Thus, fiber post minimizes the risk of root fractures and lead to more favorable failure mode than metallic posts.The durability of restored endodontically treated teeth depends on many basic factors [1] including the amount of remaining coronal structure, restorative procedures and the materials used [2,3], which appear to be the key factors affecting the longevity of the tooth. Although low percentage failure rates and satisfactory clinical performance have been reported when fiber posts were used [4, 5, 6], pulpless teeth are still considered more vulnerable and susceptible to fracture in comparison to vital teeth [7].The clinical success of a recovery depends on the quality and durability of the bonding joint between the fiber post and the tooth structure. Therefore, it is fundamental that the test method used to evaluate the bond strength provides accurate information on the materials performance [8]. Reviews published in the decades of 1990 and 2010 [9-13] showed a relationship between the conditions for adhesion of post to the substrate, including cement application mode, post pretreatment and sample storage conditions, but only few discussed the variables that influence the bond strength tests. Downloaded by [Florida Atlantic University] at 16:14 06 June 2016 A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 3The bond strength tests might be influenced by many variables which include: the specimen design, the size of the adhesion surface area, the loading configuration and the type of materials [2,[16][17][18]. The high modulus of elasticity of a bonded composite, the thickness of the adhesive layer between the dentin of the root canal and the post, the format of post and the canal, among others, are variables that influence the stress distribution along the bonded interface [3,18,19] and consequently the outcome of the bond streng...

show abstract

Stress distribution on dentin-cement-post interface varying root canal and glass fiber post diameters. A three-dimensional finite element analysis based on micro-CT data

Cited by 39 publications

References 28 publications

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Lithium Disilicate Crowns Retained with Fiber Posts Compared to Lithium Disilicate and Cerasmart Endocrowns: In Vitro Study

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Lithium Disilicate Crowns Retained with Fiber Posts Compared to Lithium Disilicate and Cerasmart Endocrowns: In Vitro Study

Correlation between the Mechanical Properties and Structural Characteristics of Different Fiber Posts Systems

Test methods for bond strength of glass fiber posts to dentin: A review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About