2018
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4162-9325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of non-genetic factors on milk yields traits in Simmental cows raised subtropical climate condition

Abstract: In conclusion, based on the findings of the present study, the milk yield traits of Simmental cows raised at subtropical climate conditions with ideal feeding and management strategies was in accordance with world standards.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are similar with results of Bujko et al, 2006; Dohi et al, 2010; Dayyani et al, 2013; Toledo-Alvarado et al, 2017; Bujko et al, 2018a, b. Rzewuska, Srabel (2015 and Bolacali, Öztürk (2017) report statistically significant influence of non-genetic factors as breeder, year and season of calving, order of lactation on reproductive traits, which correspond to our results. Grades of freedom, 2 Coefficient of determination (R 2 ), 3 Days to first service (DFS), 4 Days open (DO), 5 Numbers of inseminations per conception (NIC), 6 Calving interval (CI), -P > 0.05, + P < 0.05, ++ P < 0.01, +++ P < 0.001…”
Section: Iii: Relation Between Evaluations Of Reproduction Traits In supporting
confidence: 93%
“…These results are similar with results of Bujko et al, 2006; Dohi et al, 2010; Dayyani et al, 2013; Toledo-Alvarado et al, 2017; Bujko et al, 2018a, b. Rzewuska, Srabel (2015 and Bolacali, Öztürk (2017) report statistically significant influence of non-genetic factors as breeder, year and season of calving, order of lactation on reproductive traits, which correspond to our results. Grades of freedom, 2 Coefficient of determination (R 2 ), 3 Days to first service (DFS), 4 Days open (DO), 5 Numbers of inseminations per conception (NIC), 6 Calving interval (CI), -P > 0.05, + P < 0.05, ++ P < 0.01, +++ P < 0.001…”
Section: Iii: Relation Between Evaluations Of Reproduction Traits In supporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the present study, the year of insemination had a significant effect on NRR, FS and GL, and the year of birth had a significant effect on AFC. A similar study on the Simmental breed, has shown that the year effect is strong on female reproductive traits, the effect of the AI technician is significant on FS and AFC, but age at first insemination is not significant in any of the traits [9]. By contrast, reproductive traits in dairy heifers are influenced by age at first insemination: heifers inseminated at an older age for the first time have a slightly higher rate of success at first insemination and, as a result, require a smaller number of services [13].…”
Section: F-value P-value F-value P-value F-value P-value F-value P-vamentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The number of reports on reproductive traits of Japanese Black heifers is relatively small. Low heritabilities of reproductive traits is attributed to nongenetic effects, especially farm management practices that largely affect the reproductive performance of heifers [9]. Selection of reproductive traits in heifers based on genetic parameters may potentially solve reproduction problems in the raising of beef calves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in Slovakia (Strapák et al, 2013;Kadlečík et al, 2017;Bujko et al 2018aBujko et al ,b, 2019Kasarda et al, 2019), Austria (Ledinek et al, 2019), Serbia (Perišić et al, 2009, Bulgaria (Karamfilov and Nikolov, 2019), Turkish (Bolacali and Öztürk, 2017;Öner et al, 2019), Romanian (Grădinaru et al, 2014;Cziszter et al, 2017), Poland (Zółkiewski et al, 2018, France (Doublet et al, 2019), Mexican (Utrera et al, 2018) and other countries (Strapák et al, 2013).…”
Section: Changes In Production and Reproduction Traits In Population mentioning
confidence: 99%