2016
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4162-8446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parâmetros genéticos e efeitos de sexo e cruzamento recíproco sobre características de interesse econômico em aves F2

Abstract: RESUMOEste estudo teve por objetivo estimar os parâmetros genéticos de características de interesse econômico, mensuradas em populações F2 desenvolvidas pela Embrapa Suínos e Aves utilizando cruzamento recíproco entre linhagens de corte e de postura. Ainda, foram avaliados os efeitos de sexo e de cruzamento recíproco sobre as características em estudo. Os pesos com um, 35 e 42 dias de idade; ganho de peso; consumo de ração e conversão alimentar entre 35 e 41 dias de idade; pesos dos pulmões, fígado, coração, m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study using a larger dataset from the same chicken population comprising 2063 F 2 -TCTC population, reported pedigree-based heritability for HWT, LIVWT, GIZZWT, LUNGWT and INTES equal to 0.19 ± 0.04, 0.14 ± 0.05, 0.70 ± 0.05, 0.60 ± 0.05 and 0.04 ± 0.02, respectively [42]. The genomic heritability estimates for HWT and LIVWT were similar to the heritability reported herein and, the differences observed in GIZZWT, LUNGWT and INTES estimates could be due the reduced sample size used herein, which may not represent the genetic variance for these traits in the whole population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study using a larger dataset from the same chicken population comprising 2063 F 2 -TCTC population, reported pedigree-based heritability for HWT, LIVWT, GIZZWT, LUNGWT and INTES equal to 0.19 ± 0.04, 0.14 ± 0.05, 0.70 ± 0.05, 0.60 ± 0.05 and 0.04 ± 0.02, respectively [42]. The genomic heritability estimates for HWT and LIVWT were similar to the heritability reported herein and, the differences observed in GIZZWT, LUNGWT and INTES estimates could be due the reduced sample size used herein, which may not represent the genetic variance for these traits in the whole population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same population (Embrapa F 2 Chicken Resource Population), pedigree-based heritability for ABF was estimated at 0.33 ± 0.19 in the F 2 -CTCT generation (layer males crossed with broiler females) and 0.82 ± 0.3 in the F 2 -TCTC generation (broiler males crossed with layer females) 28 . Considering the carcass fat content traits, heritability estimates for CFC expressed in percentage of wet carcass was 0.53 ± 0.10, and the heritability for fat percentage in dry-matter basis (CFCDM) was 0.55 ± 0.10, using records of 3,422 chickens 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%