2015
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4162-7098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composição nutricional de milho Bt ensilado com inoculante enzimobacteriano e avaliado em ovinos

Abstract: RESUMOO objetivo foi avaliar as características agronômicas e químico-bromatológicas de dois híbridos de milho Bt (30F35H e CD397YH) ensilados com inoculante enzimobacteriano. Os teores de FDN foram semelhantes para todas as frações de planta, já o teor de FDA diferiu quanto à planta inteira e colmo, enquanto a lignina diferiu em relação à planta inteira, colmo e sabugo. A DIVMS não apresentou diferença entre os híbridos em nenhuma das frações. As silagens foram produzidas em silos experimentais (aproximadamen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no difference (P = 0.19) in the total carbohydrates (TC) of silage from the different treatments, whose average grades are close to most of the values reported by Rabelo et al (2014), Tres et al (2014), Gonçalves et al (2015), and Moro et al (2015), whereas in corn silage, the proportions of mineral matter, CP, and ether extract are relatively constant. There was also no difference (P = 0.30) in the non-fiber carbohydrates (NFC) of the treatments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…There was no difference (P = 0.19) in the total carbohydrates (TC) of silage from the different treatments, whose average grades are close to most of the values reported by Rabelo et al (2014), Tres et al (2014), Gonçalves et al (2015), and Moro et al (2015), whereas in corn silage, the proportions of mineral matter, CP, and ether extract are relatively constant. There was also no difference (P = 0.30) in the non-fiber carbohydrates (NFC) of the treatments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%