2015
DOI: 10.1590/1677-3225v14n4a12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Aim: To determine if the prevalence of enamel hypoplasia, molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) and deciduous molar hypomineralisation (DMH) is associated with the socioeconomic status of the child and to determine the prevalence of enamel hypoplasia and MIH/DMH comorbidity in the study population. Methods: Information was collected on the sex and socioeconomic status of the 1,169 study participants' resident in Ile-Ife, Nigeria, recruited through a household survey. The children were clinically examined to a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oyedele et al [ 20 ] however demonstrated no association between socio-economic status and MIH. Temilola and Folayan [ 28 ] also highlighted that socio-economic status cannot be used as a distinguishing feature for MIH and enamel hypoplasia. Multiple studies had highlighted the association between DDEs such as enamel hypoplasia and socio-economic status – with the prevalence of enamel hypoplasia being higher among children with lower socio-economic status [ 57 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Oyedele et al [ 20 ] however demonstrated no association between socio-economic status and MIH. Temilola and Folayan [ 28 ] also highlighted that socio-economic status cannot be used as a distinguishing feature for MIH and enamel hypoplasia. Multiple studies had highlighted the association between DDEs such as enamel hypoplasia and socio-economic status – with the prevalence of enamel hypoplasia being higher among children with lower socio-economic status [ 57 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of MIH ranged between 9.7% and 17.7% [ 20 , 21 ], while that of enamel hypoplasia ranged between 0.13% and 3.6% in the permanent dentition [ 22 26 ] and 2.3% to 4.0% in the primary dentition [ 23 , 27 ]. Co-existence of MIH and enamel hypoplasia had also been described [ 28 ]. These lesions were also associated with co-morbidities that affect oral health quality of life [ 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,8,10,14,18,21- 33 The most frequent age was 8 years (77.2%), ranging from 034 to 19 years. 32 Regarding the type of study, the most common was the cross-sectional design (91.2%). The prevalence of MIH ranged from 0.48% in Indian children 28 to 37.3% in Danish children.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the sample number, there is a variation from 99 2 to 3,591 individuals; 20 however, few studies have used probability sampling. 5,8,10,14,18, [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] To estimate the prevalence of a condition in studies, it is necessary to have a minimum number of children randomly selected. In studies with a smaller number of children, the prevalence may be higher or lower than estimated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%