2022
DOI: 10.1590/1519-6984.242403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation on the chloroplast and nuclear genomes of taxa belong to the subgenus Dracunculus (Bess.) Rydb. of Artemisia L. (Asteraceae) in Turkey

Abstract: Artemisia is one of the biggest genera in the family Asteraceae, with around 500-600 taxa at specific and sub-specific levels and organised in 5 subgenera. Due to the high number of taxa, a lot taxonomists are trying to solve the problem of its classification and phylogeny but its natural classification still hasn’t been achieved. In this research, 60 individuals belonging to 4 taxa of the subgenus Dracunculus of Artemisia L. in Turkey were examined. For all the examined individuals from both the same and diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…araratica that are new combinations in the revisionary study was proposed to raise to species level again (Civelek et al, 2019). Thus, like in the Flora of Turkey, the new systematic positions and combinations of the three varieties of the species A. campestris became independent species A. campestris, A. marschalliana, and A. araratica, like the Flora of Turkey (Table 6) (Civelek et al, 2019;Sancar et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…araratica that are new combinations in the revisionary study was proposed to raise to species level again (Civelek et al, 2019). Thus, like in the Flora of Turkey, the new systematic positions and combinations of the three varieties of the species A. campestris became independent species A. campestris, A. marschalliana, and A. araratica, like the Flora of Turkey (Table 6) (Civelek et al, 2019;Sancar et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%