Validation of a questionnaire of knowledge and attitudes about the subcutaneous venous reservoir in nursing

Raña-Rocha, Roberto; López-de-Ullibarri, Ignacio; Movilla‐Fernández, María‐Jesús; Coronado, Carmen

doi:10.1590/1518-8345.3255.3250

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Ressalta-se a necessidade da avaliação do enfermeiro sobre as condições do local de inserção e presença de dor antes de realizar a primeira punção (7,(16)(17) . Os ajustes sugeridos pelos especialistas na questão 9 foram pertinentes e consonantes com estudos (3)(4)(5) que evidenciam a utilização do dispositivo imediatamente após sua inserção.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…Para o instrumento poder medir o grau de conhecimento dos enfermeiros, foram atribuídos valores a cada questão: as questões consideradas de fácil conhecimento valeram 0,25 ponto; as de nível intermediário, 0,5 ponto; e as de nível elevado, 1 ponto. A escolha da valoração dos itens foi embasada na complexidade dos conhecimentos e habilidades dos enfermeiros sobre o dispositivo (7)(8)(9)(15)(16) . Essa distribuição da pontuação também foi avaliada pelos especialistas.…”

Section: Métodosunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development and validation of an instrument to assess the knowledge of oncology nurses about a fully implanted catheter

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: to develop and validate an instrument to assess the knowledge of oncology nurses about the fully implanted central venous catheter. Methods: this is a methodological study. The instrument was built based on an integrative review and included 25 questions (10 about general aspects of the device and puncture; 10 about heparinization and complications; and 5 about the dressing). After construction, the instrument was evaluated by five experts, in a single round, in four items, on the adequacy of the questions to the objectives of the instrument, the valuation of the questions, the content and the clarity of each question. Adequacy was confirmed by the minimum Concordance Index of 80%. Results: all items in the questions about heparinization and complications were considered adequate, and two questions about general aspects and puncture and one question about dressing had an agreement rate of 60%. Changes were made as suggested by experts. Conclusion: the instrument, for the most part, presented clear, relevant questions that serve the purpose. Contributions to practice: it is expected to contribute with institutions and with a safe care of nurses who assist cancer patients with fully implanted catheters.

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

Section: Métodosunclassified

Development and validation of an instrument to assess the knowledge of oncology nurses about a fully implanted catheter

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Cross-Cultural Validation of the Healthcare Provider’s Practices, Attitudes, Self-Confidence, and Knowledge Regarding Bullying Questionnaire

Celdrán-Navarro,

Jiménez-Ruiz,

Seva-Llor

et al. 2024

Healthcare

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How can we know the reality of the context of bullying in the field of primary health care? The aim of this study is to obtain a validated and reliable tool that allows measurement of the involvement of primary care professionals in addressing bullying through a systematic content validation process. A cross-cultural validation of the Healthcare Provider’s Practices, Attitudes, Self-Confidence, and Knowledge Regarding Bullying Questionnaire was conducted for the Spanish perspective. This involved linguistic adaptation through translation–back-translation, content validity index (CVI) analysis, construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α). The total CVI was 0.95, with individual item scores ≥ 0.78. CFA revealed a good fit for the three subscales, with discrimination indices (item–total correlation within the dimension) > 0.30. Cronbach’s α for each dimension indicated a high level of reliability, with values of 0.735 for attitudes, 0.940 for self-confidence, and 0.895 for knowledge. The questionnaire is valid and reliable for evaluating the knowledge, attitudes, and self-confidence of primary care professionals in Spain regarding bullying. Its validity and reliability guarantee its potential use in other health settings and may lead to better training of professionals and school biopsychosocial health.

show abstract

Validation of a questionnaire of knowledge and attitudes about the subcutaneous venous reservoir in nursing

Cited by 2 publications

References 19 publications

Development and validation of an instrument to assess the knowledge of oncology nurses about a fully implanted catheter

Development and validation of an instrument to assess the knowledge of oncology nurses about a fully implanted catheter

Cross-Cultural Validation of the Healthcare Provider’s Practices, Attitudes, Self-Confidence, and Knowledge Regarding Bullying Questionnaire

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About