Evaluation of digital vaccine card in nursing practice in vaccination room

Abstract

Objective: develop and evaluate a vaccine application for mobile devices, with update integrated with the National Immunization Program Information System, for care in vaccination rooms. Method: methodological research based on the Pressman System Development Life Cycle theory developed in three stages: integrative literature review, computational development, and application evaluation. The product was evaluated as to satisfaction, using a validated questionnaire, and as to usability by the System Usability Scale. Results: the application functionalities were based on the survey of technological Innovations on immunization, published in the scientific literature. It displays user vaccines directly from the National Immunization Program Information System, notifies about upcoming vaccines, and enables the inclusion of vaccine cards of dependents. The evaluation resulted in users’ mean score of 90.5 ± 11.1 and health professionals’ mean score of 84.2 ± 19.4. Conclusion: the application is a technological tool with potential to improve the work process in vaccination rooms and to reach the goals of vaccine coverage. It synchronizes data with the National Immunization Program Information System, thus enabling the maintenance of people’s vaccination history.

Assessing a Smartphone App (AICaries) That Uses Artificial Intelligence to Detect Dental Caries in Children and Provides Interactive Oral Health Education: Protocol for a Design and Usability Testing Study

“…For the step 2 AICaries field testing, the System Usability Scale (SUS) will be used to assess the acceptance of the AICaries (part 2 of Multimedia Appendix 1 ). The SUS instrument [ 31 - 33 ] is widely adopted in business and technology industries and mHealth fields to measure and quantify the perception of product and service usability. A SUS score above 68 indicates above-average usability; a score above 80.3 indicates excellent usability of the AICaries app.…”

Assessment of an Innovative Mobile Dentistry eHygiene Model Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic in the National Dental Practice–Based Research Network: Protocol for Design, Implementation, and Usability Testing

“…The sample size calculation for the primary outcome (eHygiene—SUS) was based on the primary outcome of the SUS score from patients. Various studies [ 7 , 14 , 15 ] have used the SUS scale to assess the usability of a medical service or mHealth tool and reported mean SUS scores of 47.5-81.2 (SD 9.9-21.1). Since the patients in the eHygiene study are clustered by practice, we used a cluster randomized design calculation for the sample size calculation.…”

“…The SUS instrument will be used to assess the acceptance of the mDent eHygiene approach. The SUS instrument [7][8][9] is widely adopted in business and technology industries and mHealth b fields to measure and quantify the perception of product and service usability. The DPC component will be used to assesses how well the patients understand the planned treatment and the quality of the communication between the patients and dentists using eHygiene.…”

Artificial intelligence-powered smartphone application, AICaries, improves at-home dental caries screening in children: Moderated and unmoderated usability test

“…After two weeks, we administered in-person evaluation of System Usability Scale (SUS) via a questionnaire. The SUS instrument [20][21][22] is widely adopted in business and technology industries and mHealth fields to measure and quantify the perception of product and service usability. It consists of a 10 item questionnaire with five response options for each item from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree [23].…”