Heart Rate Variability and Body Composition as Vo2max Determinants

León-Ariza, Henry H.; Botero‐Rosas, Daniel Alfonso; Zea-Robles, Aura C.

doi:10.1590/1517-869220172304152157

Cited by 8 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 33 publications

(26 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A strong negative correlation was found in the study by Ostojić & Živanić (2011) (r=-0.76) and a very similar result was reported by Mondal & Mishra (2017) (r=-0.75) in the total sample. Other studies shown no significant correlation between body fat percent and VO 2max , (r=0.16; r=-0.10) (León-Ariza et al, 2017;Shete et al, 2014). The results of the present study are in accordance with the findings from other studies which confirmed that the sum of trunk skinfolds as an indicator of fat distribution and total body fatness and cardiorespiratory fitness are frequently used in association with each other and it is often implied that these parameters have a strongly inversely proportional relationship.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…The current results showed a statistically positive correlation between MM% and VO 2max only in the total sample (r=0.45). Similar results were found in a previous study of León-Ariza et al (2017), which demonstrated that muscle mass exhibited a stronger positive correlation with VO 2max (r=0.61) in the total sample. In this study a significant correlation between FFM and VO 2max was found only in the total sample (r=0.31), similar coefficient (r=0.37) was reported in a study by Mondal & Mishra (2017).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Association Between Body Composition and Cardiorespiratory Fitness of Adolescents

Stojanović

Branković

2018

FU Phys Ed Sport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the aim to investigate the association between body composition of adolescents and cardiorespiratory fitness, this research was carried out on a sample of seventh grade primary school students (38 female and 44 male students). The sample of measuring instruments for body composition assessment were: body mass index, triceps, subscapularis and suprailiac subcutaneous adipose tissue, body fat percentage, muscle mass percentage and fat-free mass. The “Beep” test was used for the assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness. At the multivariate level the results have shown that body composition, as a system predictor, explained 51% (p= .000) of variance of cardiorespiratory fitness of the total sample of students, 29% (p= .021) of the girls and 51% (p= .000) of the boys. At the univariate level of the total sample it was noticed that the sum of three skinfolds (t= -4.91; p= .000) and fat-free mass (t= 4.54; p= .000) had a high influence on system prediction. The sum of three skinfolds in the total sample, sample of girls and sample of boys had a negative impact on cardiorespiratory fitness. For the girls, body fat percentage had a positive impact on cardiorespiratory fitness, while in the total sample and sample of boys, fat-free mass had a positive impact on cardiorespiratory fitness. It could be concluded that the association between body composition components and VO2max was clearly demonstrated in adolescents.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Association Between Body Composition and Cardiorespiratory Fitness of Adolescents

Stojanović

Branković

2018

FU Phys Ed Sport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Concerning breast cancer, evidence suggests that body composition is a crucial contributor to clinical outcomes after surgery 11 . In addition, relevant findings indicate that changes in body composition may lead to modifications in the autonomic cardiac function 12 . It is known that autonomic dysfunction represents a loss of normal autonomic control of the cardiovascular system associated with both increases in sympathetic nervous system activation and reduced efficacy of the parasympathetic nervous system 3 that may affect one or more systems of the body 13 , 14 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differences in heart rate variability and body composition in breast cancer survivors and women without cancer

Escutia-Reyes

Garduño-García

Emilio-López-Chávez

et al. 2021

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to explore cardiac autonomic changes assessed by linear and nonlinear indexes of heart rate variability (HRV) and body composition modifications in breast cancer survivors and cancer-free control women. Women who were breast cancer survivors (BCS, n = 27) and without cancer with similar characteristics (Control, n = 31) were recruited for this study. We calculated some relevant linear and nonlinear parameters of 5 min of RR interval time series such as mean RR interval (RRave), the corrected Poincaré index (cSD1/SD2), the sample entropy (SampEn), the long-term fractal scaling exponent (α2) and 2UV from symbolic dynamics. Additionally, we indirectly assessed body composition measures such as body weight, fat mass, visceral fat rating (VFR), normalized VRF (nVFR), muscle mass, metabolic age, and total body water. We found that diverse HRV indexes and only one body composition measure showed statistical differences (p < 0.05) between the BCS and Control groups. RRave: 729 (648–802) vs. 795 (713–852) ms; cSD2/SD1: 3.4 (2.7–5.0) vs. 2.9 (2.3–3.5); SampEn: 1.5 (1.3–1.8) vs. 1.7 (1.5–1.8); α2: 0.6 (0.3–0.6) vs. 0.5 (0.4–0.5); 2UV: 7.1 (4.3–11.5) vs. 10.8 (6.4–15.7) and nVFR 0.12 (0.11–0.13) vs. 0.10 (0.08–0.12) points/kg, respectively. The nVFR was strongly significantly correlated with several indexes of HRV only in the BCS group.Our findings suggest that BCS exhibit lower parasympathetic cardiac activity and changes in HRV patterns compared to Controls. A concomitant increase of visceral fat, among other factors, may contribute to cardiac autonomic disturbances and changes in HRV patterns in BCS.

show abstract

“…Changes in body composition may lead to modi cations in the autonomic cardiac function 19 . Data indicate that physical training can reverse impaired cardiorespiratory tness and autonomic modulation in women with breast cancer receiving adjuvant therapy 20 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differences in Heart Rate Variability and Body Composition in Breast Cancer Survivors and Women Without Cancer

Escutia-Reyes

Garduño-García

López-Chávez

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To explore cardiac autonomic changes assessed by linear and nonlinear indexes of heart rate variability (HRV) and body composition modifications in breast cancer survivors and cancer-free control women. Methods: Women who were breast cancer survivors (BCS, n=27) and cancer-free control participants with similar characteristics (Control, n=31) were enrolled in the Regional General Hospital No. 251 of the Mexican Institute of Social Security (Metepec, Mexico). We processed five minutes of R-R interval time series, and we calculated relevant linear and nonlinear parameters of HRV such as mean RR interval (RRave), the Root Mean Square of the Successive Differences (RMSSD), the Poincaré plot measures SD1, SD2, SD1/SD2, and the sample entropy (SampEn). Additionally, we indirectly assessed body composition measures such as body weight, fat mass, visceral fat rating (VFR), normalized VRF (nVFR), muscle mass, metabolic age, and total body water.Results: We found that diverse HRV indexes and only one body composition measure showed statistical differences (p<0.05) between the BCS and Control groups: RRave: 729 (648–802) vs. 795 (713–852) ms; RMSSD: 16.5 (8.9–27.0) vs. 19.7 (14.2–28.5) ms; SD1: 11.6 (6.3–19.0) vs. 13.9 (10.0–20.1) ms; SD1/SD2: 2.5 (2.1–3.3) vs. 2.2 (1.9–2.7), SampEn: 1.5 (1.3–1.8) vs. 1.7 (1.5–1.8), and nVFR 0.12 (0.11–0.13) vs.0.10 (0.08–0.12) points/kg, respectively. The nVFR was significantly correlated to several indexes of HRV.Conclusions: BCS exhibit a lower parasympathetic cardiac activity and changes in HRV patterns than controls, likely because of the concomitant increase of visceral fat.

show abstract

Heart Rate Variability and Body Composition as Vo2max Determinants

Cited by 8 publications

References 33 publications

Association Between Body Composition and Cardiorespiratory Fitness of Adolescents

Association Between Body Composition and Cardiorespiratory Fitness of Adolescents

Differences in heart rate variability and body composition in breast cancer survivors and women without cancer

Differences in Heart Rate Variability and Body Composition in Breast Cancer Survivors and Women Without Cancer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About