Kraepelin’s views on obsessive neurosis: a comparison with DSM-5 criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder

Steinberg, Holger; Carius, Dirk; Fontenelle, Leonardo F.

doi:10.1590/1516-4446-2016-1959

Cited by 11 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Im Übrigen konzeptualisieren Kraepelin wie Kaan Angststörungen und die Zwangsneurose als eng verflochten [28]. Am Ende seines wirkmächtigen nosologischen Schaffens werden beide von Kraepelin sogar zu einer Entität verknüpft [34,35].…”

Section: Die Ausgangssituationunclassified

Die Therapie von Angststörungen um 1900. Hermann Oppenheim (1858–1919) und seine frühen Innovationen

Moenikes,

Steinberg

2023

Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ZusammenfassungAls nervenärztlicher Lehrer und Lehrbuchautor erfuhr Oppenheim zunächst große Anerkennung. Mit seiner Monografie zur traumatischen Neurose (1892), die er als Folge organischer bzw. molekularer Veränderungen ansah, geriet er immer mehr in Kritik und Ablehnung vorwiegend seitens deutscher Kollegen. Seine jüdische Herkunft spielte hierbei eine Rolle. Kaum historische Beachtung hingegen findet bislang Oppenheims Auseinandersetzung mit dem Phänomen der Angst, welches sich zu seiner Zeit noch als ein wenig definiertes pathologisches Störungsbild darstellt. Oppenheim betrachtet in seinen Arbeiten v. a. der Jahre nach 1900 Angststörungen als ätiologisch multifaktoriell bedingte Krankheitserscheinung und gesteht ihnen einen syndromalen Charakter zu. Therapeutisch orientiert er sich nicht nur an gängigen Behandlungsmethoden wie der Diätetik oder der Psychoanalyse, sondern sieht den Patienten als zu respektierendes, wertzuschätzendes Individuum. Daraus leitet er selbstentwickelte psychotherapeutische Behandlungsmethoden ab, die Ähnlichkeit mit heutigen Verfahren der kognitiven Verhaltenstherapie aufweisen, wie die Ablenkung von angstauslösenden Gedanken, die Orientierung auf persönliche Ressourcen des Patienten oder die Konfrontation mit der Angstsituation. Oppenheims Beiträge zu den Angststörungen erweisen sich als für ihre Zeit innovativ.

show abstract

Section: Die Ausgangssituationunclassified

Die Therapie von Angststörungen um 1900. Hermann Oppenheim (1858–1919) und seine frühen Innovationen

Moenikes,

Steinberg

2023

Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These ‘impulses’ indicate an ego‐syntonic disorder; that is, a disorder in which the behavior is coherent with the individual’s will and intention: pursuing the alluring urge results in short‐term gratification. Crucially, ego‐syntonic impulsivity strongly overlaps with ego‐dystonic or compulsive disorders; that is, disorders in which the behaviors are aimed at suppressing intrusive and unwanted thoughts or urges to avoid the related anxiety: for example, ‘the urge to cry out swear words, scurrilities, blasphemic expressions, or push stones off a wall’ [28, 29]. This overlap between impulsive and compulsive conditions contributed to the categorical inconsistencies that we can observe within successive editions of international taxonomies of mental disorders (Fig.…”

Section: Historical and Taxonomic Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Behavioral excess and disruptive conduct: A historical and taxonomic approach to the origin of the ‘impulse control disorders’ diagnostic construct

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims Impulse control disorders (ICDs) are iatrogenic and idiopathic conditions with psychosocial and economic consequences for the affected individuals and their families (e.g. bankruptcy and divorce). However, the definition of ICDs has changed over time, and ICDs are not consistently included within existing taxonomies. We discuss the origins of the ICD diagnostic construct and its unsolved tensions. Methods To contextualize the ICD diagnostic construct, we provided an overview of its origins in past centuries and followed its development across multiple editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and the International Classification of Diseases, as well as its definition within emerging ontologies. Results Two independent roots of the ICD construct emerged: (a) the interest in behavioral excess as expressed in encyclopedic compilations (18th century) and (b) the juridical debate on disruptive conduct and responsibility (19th–20th centuries). These roots underlie the repeated taxonomic remodeling observed throughout the 20th and 21st centuries and three critical issues persisting in both clinical practice and research. First, the number of ICDs keeps increasing across the spectrum of human behaviors, disregarding common pathogenetic and phenomenological grounds. Secondly, ICDs substantially overlap with other mental conditions. Impulsivity is often neglected as a minor inconvenience or side effect when co‐occurring with major diagnoses (e.g. depression) and therefore inadequately managed. Finally, ICDs’ definitions display an unsolved tension between being conceived as hobby, moral fault or pathological drive, which may be responsible for stigma and delayed intervention. Conclusion The reasons that made impulse control disorders (ICDs) difficult to define from their first conceptualization are the same reasons that now complicate taxonomic efforts and diagnosis. Tracing back ICDs’ roots and criticalities can help to define a common and less ambiguous theoretical framework, which may also result in the demise of the ICD construct and a move towards more clearly defined and more useful ontologies.

show abstract

“…Individual differences can be seen in the level of a person's desire to succeed and achieve results, a person's ability to cope with his or her need for urgency, how much one feels able to influence and control events, the extent to which one plans and manages his or her time to deal with problems [9] [12]. Researchers have suggested that a person's degree of vulnerability, extroversion, compulsiveness, and belief in his or her abilities to respond to difficult or novel situations and possible stressors might influence his or her level of psychological health condition [13].…”

Section: Background Of Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring Personal Factors That Might Influence the Vulnerability of Construction Employees to Occupational Psychological Disorders

Fordjour¹,

Chan²,

Amoah³

2019

Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Personal factors could act as intervening variables between the causes and effects of psychological health conditions of employees. This study focused on six personal intervening factors that were associated with the risks of occupational psychological disorders namely: low self-esteem, negative personality trait, unproductive core beliefs, poor self-concept evaluation on performance, poor relationship with others and poor time management skills. An investigation on the level of severity of these personal intervening factors was conducted involving 150 construction professionals and 150 construction trade workers, who were purposively selected in Ghana. The personal factors that were found to be prevalent among the construction employees were low self-esteem and poor time management skills.

show abstract

Kraepelin’s views on obsessive neurosis: a comparison with DSM-5 criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder

Cited by 11 publications

References 33 publications

Die Therapie von Angststörungen um 1900. Hermann Oppenheim (1858–1919) und seine frühen Innovationen

Die Therapie von Angststörungen um 1900. Hermann Oppenheim (1858–1919) und seine frühen Innovationen

Behavioral excess and disruptive conduct: A historical and taxonomic approach to the origin of the ‘impulse control disorders’ diagnostic construct

Exploring Personal Factors That Might Influence the Vulnerability of Construction Employees to Occupational Psychological Disorders

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About