2015
DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2014-1378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Brazilian policy of withholding treatment for ADHD is probably increasing health and social costs

Abstract: Objective: To estimate the economic consequences of the current Brazilian government policy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment and how much the country would save if treatment with immediate-release methylphenidate (MPH-IR), as suggested by the World Health Organization (WHO), was offered to patients with ADHD. Method: Based on conservative previous analyses, we assumed that 257,662 patients aged 5 to 19 years are not receiving ADHD treatment in Brazil. We estimated the direct costs … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Critics underline the lack of national policies for ADHD treatments and the complexity involved in granting access for procedures for lowincome patients to obtain methylphenidate within SUS (by lawsuits or through an administrative process beset by red tape). Maia et al (2015) estimate that only the direct consequences of not treating children with ADHD ages 5-19 would amount ∼R$ 1,841 billion/year (Brazilian real), and if the country increases its investment in treatments from the current R$ 28 million spent by families out of pocket to R$ 377 million, the amount saved would be 3.1 times higher than the expenses.…”
Section: Production Prescription and Consumption Of Methylphenidate mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critics underline the lack of national policies for ADHD treatments and the complexity involved in granting access for procedures for lowincome patients to obtain methylphenidate within SUS (by lawsuits or through an administrative process beset by red tape). Maia et al (2015) estimate that only the direct consequences of not treating children with ADHD ages 5-19 would amount ∼R$ 1,841 billion/year (Brazilian real), and if the country increases its investment in treatments from the current R$ 28 million spent by families out of pocket to R$ 377 million, the amount saved would be 3.1 times higher than the expenses.…”
Section: Production Prescription and Consumption Of Methylphenidate mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 In Brazil, an extremely conservative analysis, considering an ADHD prevalence of 0.9% (the lowest described in the country), reveals an estimated annual cost of R$ 1.6 billion/year in two main areas: grade repetition and emergency department use. 4 In the same study, the authors predicted annual savings of around R$ 1 billion/year if patients could have access to treatment with MPH-IR 30 mg/day, as suggested by the World Health Organization (WHO). 14 In contrast, economic analyses in the Brazilian mental health system are infrequent; a literature search found only one cost-effectiveness study in the mental health field in the country, on adult schizophrenia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[1][2][3] Nevertheless, MPH is not an available treatment for many people in low/middleincome countries (LMICs), such as Brazil, where it is estimated that around 257,662 individuals are not receiving ADHD treatment. 4 The decision to provide treatment in the Brazilian public health system lies with healthcare managers. 5 ADHD is characterized by non-episodic inattention and/or a hyperactivity/impulsivity behavior pattern occurring more frequently than expected for the patient's age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommended treatments include medication and psychosocial interventions. In Brazil, the most readily available treatment is pharmacotherapy; however, the published research indicates that less than 20% of children with ADHD are prescribed medication for symptom management (Maia et al, 2015). Little information is available regarding access to and use of empirically supported non-pharmacological interventions for ADHD (Ortega & Müller, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%