2013
DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2013-1086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the recognition, identification, and discrimination of facial emotions in a sample of outpatients with bipolar disorder (BD). Methods: Forty-four outpatients with diagnosis of BD and 48 matched control subjects were selected. Both groups were assessed with tests for recognition (Emotion Recognition-40 --ER40), identification (Facial Emotion Identification Test --FEIT), and discrimination (Facial Emotion Discrimination Test --FEDT) of facial emotions, as well as a theory of mind (ToM) verb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
1
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
26
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We also did not find any significant differences in gaze perception between BD patients with and without a history of psychosis, suggesting that abnormal self‐referential gaze perception may not be a marker of psychotic symptoms. This is consistent with several previous studies showing that BD patients with and without psychotic symptoms displayed no difference in their performances of various theory‐of‐mind tasks, although one study has reported that BD patients with psychosis performed worse than those without in the perceptual and reasoning aspects of social cognition, measured with tasks of emotion recognition and logical arrangement of pictures depicting social scenarios . It is also possible that altered gaze perception is only related to specific aspects of psychosis such as paranoia, and therefore correlating it with SAPS total score may not be able to capture a true relationship.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We also did not find any significant differences in gaze perception between BD patients with and without a history of psychosis, suggesting that abnormal self‐referential gaze perception may not be a marker of psychotic symptoms. This is consistent with several previous studies showing that BD patients with and without psychotic symptoms displayed no difference in their performances of various theory‐of‐mind tasks, although one study has reported that BD patients with psychosis performed worse than those without in the perceptual and reasoning aspects of social cognition, measured with tasks of emotion recognition and logical arrangement of pictures depicting social scenarios . It is also possible that altered gaze perception is only related to specific aspects of psychosis such as paranoia, and therefore correlating it with SAPS total score may not be able to capture a true relationship.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In a study by Cusi et al, performance on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task did not correlate with any social domain on the Social Adjustment Self-Report Scale in a mixed sample of Bipolar 1 Disorder patients with varying levels of depressive symptoms ( 22 ). Furthermore, a subsequent study by Benito et al uncovered no evidence for an association between performance of the Hinting Task and global functioning according to the Functioning Assessment Short Test ( 20 ). However, a prospective study by Purcell et al produced the interesting finding that abnormally short response times on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task predicted greater life functioning impairment as assessed by the Life Functioning Questionnaire ( 32 ).…”
Section: Impairments Of Theory Of Mind In Bipolar Disordermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There are inconclusive data concerning the recognition of emotions in BD patients. On one hand, there are studies indicating an impairment in emotion recognition, and in the identification and discrimination of emotions even during remission [ 193 , 209 , 229 , 231 , 240 , 242 251 ]; on the other hand, however, there are studies reporting no impairment in these domains, especially after controlling for medication and other confounding variables [ 78 , 231 , 238 , 239 , 252 257 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%