2017
DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0092060617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia?

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Dementia is a highly prevalent condition worldwide. Its chronic and progressive presentation has an impact on physical and psychosocial characteristics and on public healthcare. Our aim was to summarize evidence from Cochrane reviews on non-pharmacological treatments for cognitive disorders and dementia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. METHODS: Cochrane reviews o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, non-pharmacological interventions have become preferable options to deal with apathy due to the limited Key words dementia, apathy, non-pharmacological intervention, systematic review of systematic reviews efficacy and adverse effects of pharmacological therapies (Seitz et al, 2012). Two systematic reviews of systematic reviews (Abraha et al, 2017;Vilela, Pacheco, Latorraca, Pachito, & Riera, 2017) reveal that non-pharmacological interventions have positive effects on reducing BPSD, improving cognitive function, activities of daily living, and social interaction ability of patients with dementia. For apathy, there are several systematic reviews and meta-analyses (Brodaty & Burns, 2012;Fukushima et al, 2016;Goris, Ansel, & Schutte, 2016;Lane-Brown & Tate, 2009;Theleritis, Siarkos, Katirtzoglou, & Politis, 2016;Theleritis, Siarkos, Politis, Katirtzoglou, & Politis, 2018;Tsoi et al, 2018;Verkaik, Weert, & Francke, 2005;Zafra-Tanaka, Pacheco-Barrios, Tellez, & Taype-Rondan, 2019) of non-pharmacological interventions in patients with dementia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, non-pharmacological interventions have become preferable options to deal with apathy due to the limited Key words dementia, apathy, non-pharmacological intervention, systematic review of systematic reviews efficacy and adverse effects of pharmacological therapies (Seitz et al, 2012). Two systematic reviews of systematic reviews (Abraha et al, 2017;Vilela, Pacheco, Latorraca, Pachito, & Riera, 2017) reveal that non-pharmacological interventions have positive effects on reducing BPSD, improving cognitive function, activities of daily living, and social interaction ability of patients with dementia. For apathy, there are several systematic reviews and meta-analyses (Brodaty & Burns, 2012;Fukushima et al, 2016;Goris, Ansel, & Schutte, 2016;Lane-Brown & Tate, 2009;Theleritis, Siarkos, Katirtzoglou, & Politis, 2016;Theleritis, Siarkos, Politis, Katirtzoglou, & Politis, 2018;Tsoi et al, 2018;Verkaik, Weert, & Francke, 2005;Zafra-Tanaka, Pacheco-Barrios, Tellez, & Taype-Rondan, 2019) of non-pharmacological interventions in patients with dementia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 11 Non-pharmacological interventions, such as physical activity programmes, cognitive rehabilitation, psychological treatments, aromatherapy and light therapy have been attempted as well. 12 However, evidence as to the efficacy and safety of these therapies is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of Snoezelen therapy is questionable. Although there are some positive results reported [35,37], a more recent study did not find any significant changes in agitation after Snoezelen use [38]. An ethnographic study of Snoezelen use found that equipment predominantly stimulates vision and touch, equipment is underused, and staff receive little training in how to facilitate sessions [34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%