2017
DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2016.0194060617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing the same neuromodulation protocol may present different responses. Computational models may help in understanding such differences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Development of closed-loop systems and devices for brain stimulation ( Dura-Bernal et al, 2015 ), are currently being used and show promise in treating a wide range of neurological diseases and disorders including Parkinson, depression, and other disorders ( Johansen-Berg et al, 2008 ; Shils et al, 2008 ; Choi et al, 2015 ). Non-targeted electrostimulation using transcranial electrodes is also being widely used but remains controversial, and lacks precise clinical indications ( Lefaucheur et al, 2014 ; Esmaeilpour et al, 2017 ; Huang et al, 2017 ; Lafon et al, 2017 ; Santos et al, 2017 ). Consideration is also being given to future use of optogenetic stimulation therapies that would offer still greater precision compared to electrical stimulation – targeting not only a particular area but a particular cell type or set of cell types within that area ( Vierling-Claassen et al, 2010 ; Kerr et al, 2014 ; Samineni et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Use Of Modeling In Clinical Domains Of Brain Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of closed-loop systems and devices for brain stimulation ( Dura-Bernal et al, 2015 ), are currently being used and show promise in treating a wide range of neurological diseases and disorders including Parkinson, depression, and other disorders ( Johansen-Berg et al, 2008 ; Shils et al, 2008 ; Choi et al, 2015 ). Non-targeted electrostimulation using transcranial electrodes is also being widely used but remains controversial, and lacks precise clinical indications ( Lefaucheur et al, 2014 ; Esmaeilpour et al, 2017 ; Huang et al, 2017 ; Lafon et al, 2017 ; Santos et al, 2017 ). Consideration is also being given to future use of optogenetic stimulation therapies that would offer still greater precision compared to electrical stimulation – targeting not only a particular area but a particular cell type or set of cell types within that area ( Vierling-Claassen et al, 2010 ; Kerr et al, 2014 ; Samineni et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Use Of Modeling In Clinical Domains Of Brain Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although bihemispheric stimulation has often been considered promising, there has been little empirical research on its effect on aphasia recovery (Fiori et al, 2017;Lee et al, 2013;Marangolo et al, 2014;Santos et al, 2017). Lee et al (2013) compared the effect of bi and monohemispheric tDCS on naming and verbal fluency ability (the number of syllables produced in 1 min during an image description) in 11 patients with poststroke aphasia and found a significant improvement of naming in both conditions but a significant shorter naming response time for the group with bihemispheric stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many tDCS studies for chronic stroke aphasia have shown long-term improvement through the application of tDCS on multiple consecutive days (Baker et al, 2010;Fiori et al, 2011Fiori et al, , 2013Flöel et al, 2011;Fridriksson, 2011;Jung et al, 2011;Marangolo et al, 2011Marangolo et al, , 2013a. Although a single session of tDCS application has shown a facilitation effect in picture naming immediately after training (Monti et al, 2008;Lee et al, 2013)-but no effect in another study (Santos et al, 2017)-the long-term effect remains unclear. The results of tDCS studies on nonlinguistic functions of stroke patients suggest that the effect of single-session tDCS is short-lived; multiple sessions are probably required to bring tDCS effects to a clinically meaningful level (see review Lefaucheur et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%