2016
DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232015213.20142015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The human right to water and sanitation: a new perspective for public policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
9

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
18
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Some cities in the U.S., —such as Baltimore, Chicago, Pittsburgh, and Philadelphia, have implemented water disconnection bans. These are often in response to community-based requests in the context of rising water service prices ( Swain et al, 2020 ), and the increased adoption of the human right to water framework as part of civil society water campaigns ( Brown et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some cities in the U.S., —such as Baltimore, Chicago, Pittsburgh, and Philadelphia, have implemented water disconnection bans. These are often in response to community-based requests in the context of rising water service prices ( Swain et al, 2020 ), and the increased adoption of the human right to water framework as part of civil society water campaigns ( Brown et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nesse sentido, há uma contradição insuperável entre aceitar a mercantilização da água e o seu reconhecimento enquanto direito humano. A Organização das Nações Unidas declarou que a água limpa, segura e o saneamento são direitos essenciais para as pessoas gozarem plenamente a vida e todos os outros direitos humanos (ONU, 2010), logo, a água deve ser um bem público, gratuito e não mercantilizável, sob responsabilidade dos Estados e sob gerência dos povos (NUNES, 2009;BROWN;NEVES-SILVA;HELLER, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The (A.1) indicator relates to (i) the Human Right to Water and Sanitation (UNGA, 2010;Obani & Gupta, 2014;Brown et al, 2016) and (ii) the universal access principle adopted in the SDGs (UNGA, 2015) and checks whether the access addresses people's contextual needs. (A.1) demonstrates whether there is a possibility of legal redress when the poorest are denied WSS (Obani & Gupta, 2014).…”
Section: Social Inclusiveness and Selected Watsan Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This context was also characterised by WSS delivery moving back and forth between private and public management (see also Murtha et al (2015); Roland et al (2018)). Apart from the WatSan sector's internal dynamics, three 'systemic conditions' have impacted expansion by influencing policies (Castro, 2009;Heller, 2009): (i) the national and international political-economic framework in place (Castro, 2009;Murtha et al, 2015), including the adoption of the MDGs, the SDGs and the Human Right to Water (Heller, 2015;Brown et al, 2016); (ii) the financial support from international organisations (Castro, 2009;Murtha et al, 2015) based often on the need for rationalising the sector and supporting public-private partnerships (Bakker, 2003;Pessoa, 2008); and (iii) the role of the State in WSS management (Roland et al, 2018) (BRASIL, 2010) which sets standards for policy implementation at multiple levels and promotes good governance practices. The BS-Law goes beyond WSS and also embraces: (i) urban sanitation and solid waste management and (ii) drainage and management of urban stormwater services.…”
Section: Water and Sanitation Inclusive Indicators Application In Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%