2018
DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220182601178667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Medical Assistance Provided to Spectators at the 2014 Fifa World Cup Matches

Abstract: Objective:Several studies have already described the main injuries to soccer players during FIFA World Cup events; however, little is known about the main reasons spectators require medical assistance during these matches. The aim of this study is to assess the number of cases and main reasons spectators required medical assistance during the 2014 World Cup matches in Brazil. Methods:Data were collected from spectators who received medical assistance on all game days, and factors related to the assistance prov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, the average number of cases who visited the spectator medical room per match during RWC 2019 (9.98) was lower than the average number of medical spectator assistance cases per match in FIFA World Cup 2014 (97.2) [ 14 ]. On the other hand, for a more scientific approach to the reporting of medical issues of mass gathering events, the use of defined data points such as PPR per 10,000 and the transport to hospital rate per 10,000 has been suggested [ 3 , 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, the average number of cases who visited the spectator medical room per match during RWC 2019 (9.98) was lower than the average number of medical spectator assistance cases per match in FIFA World Cup 2014 (97.2) [ 14 ]. On the other hand, for a more scientific approach to the reporting of medical issues of mass gathering events, the use of defined data points such as PPR per 10,000 and the transport to hospital rate per 10,000 has been suggested [ 3 , 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%