2017
DOI: 10.1590/0104-6632.20170341s20150433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Approach to Assess Evaporative Cooling Under Forced Air Flow

Abstract: Air blast is one of the most employed industrial chilling methods. It can be enhanced, i.e., increasing heat transfer and reducing cooling time, by superficial evaporative phenomena. This work reports a methodology, including experimental setup and mathematical modelling, to quantify the air chilling enhancement by wetting the surface of the object to be chilled. A spherical metal model was covered by a cotton tissue (wet or dry) and placed into a cold chamber. The effective heat transfer coefficient was deter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cooling effectiveness increases with an increase in air velocity and a decrease in water temperature. The effect of airflow velocity and water flow rate on the performance of direct and indirective evaporative cooling systems is also conducted by Franco et al [14], Rodrigues et al [17], and Antonellis et al [18]. Overall it is noted that the performance is significantly affected by the water flow rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The cooling effectiveness increases with an increase in air velocity and a decrease in water temperature. The effect of airflow velocity and water flow rate on the performance of direct and indirective evaporative cooling systems is also conducted by Franco et al [14], Rodrigues et al [17], and Antonellis et al [18]. Overall it is noted that the performance is significantly affected by the water flow rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The uncertainty of the effective thermal conductivity was ± 20%, while the uncertainty in measuring the flow velocity or Reynolds number was 1 to 2% (Kline and McClintock, 1953;Kim et al, 1993;Mahgoub, 2013). Evaporative cooling using air flow was also investigated (Rodrigues et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%