2017
DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201701567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluoride Varnishes against Dental Erosion Caused by Soft Drink Combined with Pediatric Liquid Medicine

Abstract: The present study evaluated the effect of NaF and CPP-ACP/NaF varnishes to reduce erosion produced by soft drink (SD) combined or not with pediatric liquid medicine. Enamel specimens were pre-treated with fluoride varnish, according to the following groups: NaF varnish (Duraphat®) or CPP-ACP/NaF varnish (MI varnish TM ). Two types of erosive cycles were made: by soft drink erosion (SDE) or by pediatric liquid medicine plus soft drink erosion (PLM/SDE). Bovine enamel specimens were randomly assigned in six grou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Varnish is easy to apply, safe and well tolerated by babies; young children and individuals who require assistance for disabilities, besides, the formation of a mechanical barrier, in comparison with other fluoride vehicles (17). In the present study, the varnishes had the same fluoride concentration, were applied only once and completely removed after 6h (11,12,17,18) in order to simulate the clinical situation, which the varnishes might be removed through tooth brushing and chewing, focusing on the chemical effect rather than on the mechanical protection. This is the first study to assess the effect of varnishes containing fluoride with or without calcium or xylitol to reduce enamel erosion and progression of erosion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Varnish is easy to apply, safe and well tolerated by babies; young children and individuals who require assistance for disabilities, besides, the formation of a mechanical barrier, in comparison with other fluoride vehicles (17). In the present study, the varnishes had the same fluoride concentration, were applied only once and completely removed after 6h (11,12,17,18) in order to simulate the clinical situation, which the varnishes might be removed through tooth brushing and chewing, focusing on the chemical effect rather than on the mechanical protection. This is the first study to assess the effect of varnishes containing fluoride with or without calcium or xylitol to reduce enamel erosion and progression of erosion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The usage of topical fluoride varnishes and chewing gums to increase salivary flow may have some beneficial effects in reducing the dental erosion. Topical fluoride varnishes form a protective layer on the surface of the tooth thus reducing the contact of acid with enamel and also helping in enamel demineralization (3,23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of 10 blocks per group was made after performing a sample calculation to detect a significant 50% difference in mean mineral loss in each treatment group as compared with the negative control group while considering a statistical power of 80%, a unilateral test, and a significance level of 5%. 14 6Milli-Q ® water (Millipore Corp., Burlington, MA, USA) as a negative control. Subsequently, the blocks were one again exposed to in vitro erosive challenges and the topography of each block was analyzed via threedimensional (3D) noncontact optical profilometry and scanning electronic microscopy (SEM).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of 10 blocks per group was made after performing a sample calculation to detect a significant 50% difference in mean mineral loss in each treatment group as compared with the negative control group while considering a statistical power of 80%, a unilateral test, and a significance level of 5%. 14 The BioEstat 5.3 statistical analysis software program (Institute of Sustainable Development Mamirauá, Tefé, Amazonas, Brazil) was used to successfully detect a significant 50% difference in mean mineral loss in each treatment group in comparison with in the control group, considering a statistical power of 80%, a unilateral test, and a significance level of 5%. The blocks were exposed to an erosive challenge via immersion in a low-pH solution followed by immersion in another solution with neutral pH and a single application of the following products: (1) Ca 2 -MSN solution; (2) CPP-ACP slurry (CG America, Alsip, IL, USA); (3) CPP-ACP/F − slurry (CPP-ACP + 900-ppm concentration of F − from GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan); (4) TiF 4 solution (1%); or (5) sodium fluoride solution (NaF 1.36%); or (6) Milli-Q ® water (Millipore Corp., Burlington, MA, USA) as a negative control.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%