Cheiloscopic Study among Monozygotic Twins, Non-Twin Brothers and Non-Relative Individuals

Fernandes, Larissa Chaves Cardoso; Oliveira, Julyana de Araújo; Santiago, Bianca Marques; Rabello, Patrícia Moreira; Carvalho, Marcus Vítor Diniz de; Campello, Reginaldo Inojosa Carneiro; Soriano, Evelyne Pessoa

doi:10.1590/0103-6440201700922

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 13 publications

(15 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our Study on biological babies with parent's lip print analysis has shown that lip prints are not equally distributed in families but quite similar and some degree of similarity concerning the predominant grooves pattern is present in relatives. 8 We found no significant difference between biological babies and parents. statistically significant resemblance of lip print pattern were found between father to biological babies (Z-0.4978, P< 0.05) and mother to biological babies (Z-0.49917, P< 0.05) to be.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 51%

A description of lip print pattern and lip shapes in children’s and their parents among Abbottabad population in KPK, Pakistan.

Tanoli

Jadoon

Bangash

et al. 2022

TPMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To assess for any peculiar lip prints in relation to the lip shapes of individual, and determine the most common lip print type among the members of biological families. Study Design: Descriptive study. Setting: Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Women Medical & Dental College, Abbottabad. Period: January 2018 to June 2018. Material & Methods: A total of 216 individuals (father, mother, both children’s), who underwent descriptive study of lip impression collection without any anesthesia or drug, were enrolled into the present study. Father, mother and two babies of each family were selected. Lip prints of Father, mother and both babies of each family were recorded. Each lip of 54 offspring’s was compared with the corresponding lip of his/her father mother and other baby. The segments of each lip of the offspring’s that matched/ resembled with either of father mother and biological babies were recorded. Results: Out of 54-total families, biological babies of 19(35.18%) families observed resemblance with father, whereas biological babies of 35(64.81%) families observed resemblance with mother. There was no definite identical lip print observed in any of the children. Furthermore, the prevalence of Type II lip prints was higher type present in males and in females. We observed that lip shape 7 was the most frequent lip shape type in most of individuals. Conclusion: Lip prints of study participants did not clearly match with each other, evenly distributed in both genders and distinctive similar to finger prints. The data did not show any specific association of the lip print type with lip shape. It is considered feasible to apply lip prints features in personal identification.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 51%

A description of lip print pattern and lip shapes in children’s and their parents among Abbottabad population in KPK, Pakistan.

Tanoli

Jadoon

Bangash

et al. 2022

TPMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…also investigated that MZ twins presented a relevant percentage of cheiloscopic agreements and also suggested influence hereditary relationships on inherited cheiloscopic features. [15] Suzuki et al . and Hirth et al .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Heritability and correlation of lip print, palm print, fingerprint pattern and blood group in twin population

Debta

Bhuyan

et al. 2018

J Oral Maxillofac Pathol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Twins are similar in many ways owing to the genetical and environmental factors. However, still, there are certain things that are not similar among them, and this is the challenge for personal identification among the twins. Objectives: Our present study aimed to know and assess the similarities and differences present between the monozygotic (identical) and dizygotic (fraternal) twins in relation to lip prints, palm prints, fingerprints and blood group and to evaluate their heritability among parents and their offspring. Materials and Methods: The study group comprised 30 twins and their parents – 15 identical and 15 nonidentical twins. The age of twins ranged from 15 years to 40 years. Lip print, palm print, fingerprint and blood group were statistically analyzed. Results: All the data were subjected to statistical analysis. The identical twins showed more percentage of similarities in comparison to the non identical twins. The inheritance pattern was significant for twins in case of their lip prints while palm prints and finger prints showed no such significance in inheritance pattern whereas there was significant association seen in case of blood groups of identical twins and their parents. Conclusion: Lip prints, palm prints, fingerprints and blood groups are the important parameters in forensic science for individual identification. Many studies have been done till now in individual but very few studies done in twin population. To the best of knowledge, ours is the first study of its kind with multiple parameters and its heritability in twins. We have observed that heritability in twins with relation to lip print was statistically significant and all the parameters can be used independently to identify the twins.

show abstract

“…Human identification has become fundamental in every facet of human relationships, at both social and legal levels. [ 1 2 ] Dental identification, fingerprints, and DNA evaluation are possibly the most frequent methods used for identification process. However, these cannot be useful in all circumstances.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of cheiloscopy and rugoscopy in Karnataka, Kerala, and Manipuri population

Manikya¹,

Sureka²,

Prasanna³

et al. 2018

J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims and Objectives:The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare lip prints and palatal rugae pattern in Kerala, Karnataka, and Manipuri population.Materials and Methods:The study involved 180 individuals (60 each from Karnataka, Kerala, and Manipuri population). Lipstick was used to record lip prints, which were visualized by magnifying lens. Palatal rugae were recorded on maxillary casts of all subjects and analyzed following Kapali S et al.’ s classification. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20 for Windows software was used for analysis.Results:Among the study population, most frequent lip print pattern was Type 3 and least was Type 1’. When patterns were compared between groups, Type 3 was the most common in Manipuri and Kerala and Type 3 in Karnataka groups. In the entire population, males showed Type 3 and females showed Type 1. On analysis of overall rugae wavy, forward and divergence patterns were predominant. On comparison of gender, males demonstrated greater number of wavy and perpendicular rugae, and females had curved, straight, forward, and backward.Conclusion:Both cheiloscopy and rugoscopy have the prospective to recognize an individual. Cheiloscopy is more reliable than rugoscopy in making out the group and gender of an individual.

show abstract

Cheiloscopic Study among Monozygotic Twins, Non-Twin Brothers and Non-Relative Individuals

Cited by 3 publications

References 13 publications

A description of lip print pattern and lip shapes in children’s and their parents among Abbottabad population in KPK, Pakistan.

A description of lip print pattern and lip shapes in children’s and their parents among Abbottabad population in KPK, Pakistan.

Heritability and correlation of lip print, palm print, fingerprint pattern and blood group in twin population

Comparison of cheiloscopy and rugoscopy in Karnataka, Kerala, and Manipuri population

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About