2016
DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201600985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial Effect and Surface Tension of Some Chelating Solutions with Added Surfactants

Abstract: This study assessed the antimicrobial efficacy and surface tension of established irrigating solutions with a new experimental chelating solution in infected dentin tubes. Twenty-five specimens were randomly assigned to each of the irrigating solutions. Twenty specimens were used as negative and positive controls. After 21 days of contamination with E. faecalis, the irrigating solutions MTAD, QMiX and Tetraclean NA were delivered into each infected root canal. The solutions were removed and dentin samples were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, detergents decrease surface tension of solution and facilitate the contact of irrigant with the dentinal walls, enabling better smear layer removal. This could partially explain why EDTA, with higher surface tension compared to other investigated chelating solutions (Giardino, Ambu, Becce, Rimondini, & Morra, ; Giardino, Andrade, & Beltrami, ), was the least effective in smear layer removal from apical third. Lower smear layer capability of EDTA in the apical third can also be attributed to the fact that the chelate activity of the neutral EDTA solution is based not only on the removal of calcium ions from inorganic dentine but also on the elimination of calcium from the organic components of dentine, such as water‐soluble noncollagen proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Namely, detergents decrease surface tension of solution and facilitate the contact of irrigant with the dentinal walls, enabling better smear layer removal. This could partially explain why EDTA, with higher surface tension compared to other investigated chelating solutions (Giardino, Ambu, Becce, Rimondini, & Morra, ; Giardino, Andrade, & Beltrami, ), was the least effective in smear layer removal from apical third. Lower smear layer capability of EDTA in the apical third can also be attributed to the fact that the chelate activity of the neutral EDTA solution is based not only on the removal of calcium ions from inorganic dentine but also on the elimination of calcium from the organic components of dentine, such as water‐soluble noncollagen proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…01.2023). Conversely, Tetraclean NA [64], a patented citric acid-based chelator for smear layer removal, was later reported as an irritant because of its low pH, and is thus not recommended for clinical use (Analytical Report: AAA86523, Eurofins Number: STULV18AA0037-1) by Eurofins Biolab Srl (Vimodrone, Milano, Italy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After excluding studies based on title and abstract screening, 16 articles were available for full-text assessment. On careful reading, further 3 studies were excluded due to the following reasons: study done on bovine teeth [ 36 ], study that evaluated the effect of smear layer in infected dentinal tubules [ 8 ] and study that tested the bond strength of glass fiber post [ 37 ]. Finally, 13 papers were included in this systematic review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%