2021
DOI: 10.1590/0103-1104202113107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O conflito público-privado no SUS: a atenção ambulatorial especializada no Paraná

Abstract: RESUMO O conflito fundamental da saúde em sociedades capitalistas - direito social versus mercadoria - também se expressa no interior do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Este trabalho analisou a relação público-privado na oferta de serviços ambulatoriais especializados pelo SUS no estado do Paraná, no período de 1995 a 2015, em comparação com a realidade nacional. Realizou-se um estudo descritivo, com procedimentos selecionados, a partir da coleta de dados no Sistema de Informações Ambulatoriais (SIA), por meio d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…65,66 Over time, privatization occurs in different ways, and it is common to see private groups try to occupy the space of public services or private health services use subsidies from the public fund. 67,68 Concerns about the privatization of health services motivated the creation of the National Front Against the Privatization of SUS, in 2018, formed by public health professionals, students, and SUS users. However, the lack of materials and professionals in the public service, added to the delay in care or poor care, discourages users from defending the SUS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65,66 Over time, privatization occurs in different ways, and it is common to see private groups try to occupy the space of public services or private health services use subsidies from the public fund. 67,68 Concerns about the privatization of health services motivated the creation of the National Front Against the Privatization of SUS, in 2018, formed by public health professionals, students, and SUS users. However, the lack of materials and professionals in the public service, added to the delay in care or poor care, discourages users from defending the SUS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%