2017
DOI: 10.1590/0103-11042017s25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A avaliabilidade dos Núcleos de Apoio à Saúde da Família (Nasf)

Abstract: RESUMO Os Núcleos de Apoio à Saúde da Família (Nasf ) vêm se constituindo enquanto objeto de indagações e pesquisas. Com base em revisão de literatura e no discurso oficial expresso nos documentos do Ministério da Saúde, realizou-se o presente estudo de sua avaliabilidade, apontando algumas das estratégias de avaliação mais adequadas à iniciativa. A proposta Nasf se mostrou, portanto, avaliável, e a avaliação de sua lógica e estratégia, abordando sua concepção e hipóteses teóricas, ganha relevância no atual es… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
21

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…As identified in another study (20) , the findings reveal controversies related to the role of each professional and the lack of references to support the practices in this new organization. Thus, is established a paradox, since there are concerns in defining guidelines for the "intra-area" performance of Nasf-AB, but the initiative is oriented precisely in the interprofessional articulation that implies collaboration between the different knowledge and nuclei of competence of each profession.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…As identified in another study (20) , the findings reveal controversies related to the role of each professional and the lack of references to support the practices in this new organization. Thus, is established a paradox, since there are concerns in defining guidelines for the "intra-area" performance of Nasf-AB, but the initiative is oriented precisely in the interprofessional articulation that implies collaboration between the different knowledge and nuclei of competence of each profession.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…There are controversies and doubts related to the functions of each professional area in these Centers, while showing ambiguities in the support references of practices in this new organizational arrangement. One of the paradoxes is the fact that there are concerns in establishing guidelines for "intra-area" action; however, the initiative is precisely oriented in the multi and interdisciplinary articulation, which implies collaboration between different knowledge and core competencies of each profession (19) . The performance of professionals in SC seems to follow that proposed by the ministerial documents (1,5) , with characteristics of technical-care and technical-pedagogical support to the ESF and some (to a lesser extent) having roles as articulators and regulators of access to specialized health services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artigos sobre cuidados colaborativos Athié et al, 2013 28 Bonfim et al, 2013 42 Brasil, 2014 51 Campos e Domitti, 2007 23 Campos et al, 2014 26 Campos, 1999 22 Castro et al, 2016 53 Chiaverini, 2011 47 Correia et al, 2017 52 Cunha e Campos, 2011 31 Figueiredo e Campos, 2009 30 Fonseca Sobrinho et al, 2014 34 Fortes et al, 2014 37 Hirdes e Silva, 2014 39 Iglesias e Avellar, 2014 29 Machado e Camatta, 2013 27 Matuda et al, 2015 63 Oliveira e Campos, 2015 24 Quinderé et al, 2013 32 Santos et al, 2015 35 Saraiva e Zepeda, 2012 25 Silveira, 2012 49 Tesser e Poli Neto, 2017 38 Tesser, 2017 48 Archer et al, 2012 14 Bower e Gilbody, 2005 3 Coupe et al, 2014 64 Coventry et al, 2014 16 Coventry et al, 2015 59 Forsetlund et al, 2009 9 Foy et al, 2010 61 Fuller et al, 2011 62 Fuller et al, 2011 60 Gask et al, 2010 13 Giguère et al, 2012 10 Gillies et al, 2015 12 Grover e Joshi, 2015 56 Harkness e Bower, 2009 11 Katon et al, 2001 55 Kelly et al, 2011 20 Reeves et al, 2017 50 Reilly et al, 2013 15 Richards et al, 2016…”
Section: Artigos Sobre Apoio Matricialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tros serviços de saúde, sociais e comunitários, configurando redes de cuidados 37 , particularmente na proposta dos NASF 51,52 . Porém, a indefinição de escopo e prioridades deixa margem para superposição de tarefas entre especialistas e profissionais de AP 48 .…”
Section: Regulaçãounclassified