2019
DOI: 10.1590/0102.3772e35513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity evidence of a Brazilian version of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire

Abstract: Morality is a human phenomenon that involves sensitivity and skills developed by the individual throughout their social life. Considering the importance of measuring the moral concerns of adults, this paper sought validity evidence for a Brazilian version of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. Two studies were conducted, using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In the first study, 341 adults (63% women) responded to the on-line questionnaire translated and adapted to Brazilian Portuguese. The resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), using a six-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree; 6 = Strongly Agree). The questionnaire was validated in Brazil by Moreira et al (2019). In our study, the reliabilities (McDonald's omega, ω; Cronbach's alpha, α) of the individual moral foundations ranged from 0.63 (fairness) to 0.74 (sanctity) for McDonald's omega, and from 0.63 (fairness) to 0.73 (sanctity) for Cronbach's alpha.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…), using a six-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree; 6 = Strongly Agree). The questionnaire was validated in Brazil by Moreira et al (2019). In our study, the reliabilities (McDonald's omega, ω; Cronbach's alpha, α) of the individual moral foundations ranged from 0.63 (fairness) to 0.74 (sanctity) for McDonald's omega, and from 0.63 (fairness) to 0.73 (sanctity) for Cronbach's alpha.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The MFQ has also been translated to multiple languages and shows a high degree of validity in cross-cultural assessments, including Brazil (Moreira, Souza, & Guerra, 2019), China (Du, 2019), and Muslim populations in Turkey (Yilmaz, Harma, Bahçekapili, & Cesur, 2016).…”
Section: Moral Foundations Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining these criteria, Table 1 lists the highly cited studies that repeatedly meet the inclusion criteria, including the following list of surveys and their respective publication citations. Athota et al 2019;Bespalov et al 2017;Boer and Fischer 2013;Cantarero et al 2018;Curry et al 2019;Dogruyol et al 2019;Du 2019;Feldman 2019;Graham et al 2012Graham et al , 2011Haidt 2013aHaidt , 2013bHaidt and Graham 2007;Joseph 2004, 2011;Haidt et al 1993;Hu 2017;Hu et al 2020;Iurino and Saucier 2020;Kim et al 2012;Kim and Kang 2013;Koleva et al 2016;Matsuo et al 2019;Mooijman et al 2018;Moreira et al 2019;Nechtelberger et al 2017;Nejat et al 2015;Niazi et al 2020;Nilsson and Erlandsson 2015;Ochoa et al 2016;Peker et al 2018;Purzycki et al 2018;Rahman 2015;Shim et al 2018;Shweder 1990;Shweder and Haidt 1993;Shweder et al 1997 Since the focus is on contemporary publications in the last decade, studies that originated before 2010 were included if a number of current publications continued to analyze the study's data within the 2010-2020 focus (e.g., WVS, ESS, EVS). However, studies that were primarily investigated prior to 2010, without numerous contemporary analyses were excluded.…”
Section: Systematic Phasementioning
confidence: 99%