Market integration does not affect traditional ecological knowledge but contributes additional pressure on plant resources

Abstract

Market integration can aff ect the manner in which individuals learn about and use natural resources. Th e present study explores the infl uence of market integration on the traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and use of natural resources in handicraft production among the Fulni-ô indigenous people of Northeast Brazil. We collect data from 67 artisans about their traditional and non-traditional handicrafts, which are mainly produced for external trade demand (our proxy for market integration). Data regarding the distribution of knowledge among diff erent segments of the population, according to socioeconomic variables, and the comparison of plant biomass used for traditional and non-traditional handicrafts, reveals that integration does not aff ect the distribution of TEK but leads to a higher consumption of native plant resources, which can negatively aff ect the populations of the species used. Th e present fi ndings indicate a future scenario of the replacement of TEK with knowledge that yields higher economic returns. Th e most experienced artisans have greater traditional ecological knowledge of traditional handicrafts and can play a fundamental role in maintaining traditional knowledge in the context of market integration. Finally, temporal evaluation studies in particular are needed to better understand changes in knowledge derived from market integration.

Conocimiento y manejo tradicional de Agave karwinskii en el sur de México

“…Esta situación está impactando en la sustentabilidad de los procesos de apropiación de la naturaleza y sus elementos, así como en el mantenimiento de la diversidad biológica en sitios silvestres, pero también de diversos agroecosistemas (Arnaiz-Schmitz et al 2018, Drew & Henne 2006, Moreno-Calles et al 2016, Saynes-Vásquez et al 2016, Tang & Gavin 2016. Específicamente, el cambio de una dinámica de autoabasto a una regida por la demanda del mercado, ha marcado pautas en el manejo con resultados ambivalentes (Shackleton et al 2015), con una tendencia a tener saldos negativos en términos de viabilidad de los recursos y la dinámica social que se ha generado (Lima-da Silva et al 2019).…”