2017
DOI: 10.1590/0102-33062016abb0336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: In bryophytes, establishment can occur by a sexual or asexual process, but the production of spores enables colonization of a wider range of habitats and substrates than can asexual propagules. Successful germination is critical for establishment in a new environment. Th is paper addresses germination and sporeling development in Frullania ericoides, a leafy liverwort species. Fresh spores were inoculated in vitro in diff erent culture strengths of Knop's nutrient solution (one-fourth strength, half strength, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Development of axenic culture of bryophytes requires a lot of effort due to their delicate plant body, difficulty in surface sterilization, small size, endophytic microbes and proximity to soil. Axenic culture has been successful in several taxa like Syntrichia ruralis, S. laevipila, S. princeps and Grimmia dissimulata (Bagdatli and Erdag, 2017), Marchantia linearis , Funariella curviseta, Orthotrichum handiense, Entosthodon commutatus and E. hungaricus (Ros et al, 2013), Thamnobryum alopecurum , Anthoceros agrestis (Szovenyi et al, 2015), Pogonatum urnigerum (Cvetic et al, 2007), Frullania ericoides (Silva-e-costa et al, 2017), Amblystegium serpens (Cvetic et al, 2005), Herzogiella seligeri , Marchantia polymorpha , Riccia billardieri (Mahesh et al, 2018) and Rhodobryum giganteum (Chen et al, 2009).…”
Section: S301mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of axenic culture of bryophytes requires a lot of effort due to their delicate plant body, difficulty in surface sterilization, small size, endophytic microbes and proximity to soil. Axenic culture has been successful in several taxa like Syntrichia ruralis, S. laevipila, S. princeps and Grimmia dissimulata (Bagdatli and Erdag, 2017), Marchantia linearis , Funariella curviseta, Orthotrichum handiense, Entosthodon commutatus and E. hungaricus (Ros et al, 2013), Thamnobryum alopecurum , Anthoceros agrestis (Szovenyi et al, 2015), Pogonatum urnigerum (Cvetic et al, 2007), Frullania ericoides (Silva-e-costa et al, 2017), Amblystegium serpens (Cvetic et al, 2005), Herzogiella seligeri , Marchantia polymorpha , Riccia billardieri (Mahesh et al, 2018) and Rhodobryum giganteum (Chen et al, 2009).…”
Section: S301mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raising an axenic culture of bryophytes is challenging due to delicate plant body, small size and close proximity of plant parts to the soil. Several studies have succeeded in raising axenic cultures in taxa like Grimmia dissimulata, Syntrichia ruralis, S. laevipila and S. princeps (Bagdatli and Erdag 2017), Hyophilla nymaniana (Mishra et al, 2014), Entosthodon hungaricus , Marchantia linearis (Krishnan and Murugan 2014), Funariella curviseta, Orthotrichum handiense, Entosthodon commutatus and E. hungaricus (Ros et al, 2013), Thamnobryum alopecurum (Sabovljević et al, 2012), Anthoceros agrestis (Szövényi et al, 2015), Marchantia polymorpha , Pogonatum urnigerum (Cvetic et al, 2007), Frullania ericoides (Silva-e-costa et al, 2017), Amblystegium serpens (Cvetić et al, 2005), Bryum argentum and B.capillare (Sabovljević et al, 2002), Herzogiella seligeri , Riccia billardieri (Mahesh et al, 2018), Rhodobryum giganteum (Chen et al, 2009). Genus Philonotis of the family Bartramiaceae consist of 169 species worldwide, with over 26 species in India (Nisha et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sim-Sim et al (2017) reconstructed the phylogeny of this genus using morphological and anatomical characters, and indicated six species for the genus: Amphidium lapponicum, A. mougeotii, A. tortuosum, A. californicum, A. curvipes, and A. asiaticum. Palynological studies dealing with bryophyte species have made important advances since the 1980s regarding the taxonomy, ecology, and phylogeny of the group (Mogensen 1981;Luizi-Ponzo & Barth 1998;1999;Luizi-Ponzo & Melhem 2006a;b;Caldeira et al 2006;2009;Rocha et al 2008;Savaroglu & Erkara 2008;Alfayate et al 2013;Rodrigues & Luizi-Ponzo 2015;Silva-e-Costa et al 2017). However, studies on Amphidium have focused mostly on morphological and molecular characters (Rooy 1992;Goffinet et al 1998;Stech 1999;Farge et al 2000;2002;Frahm et al 2000;Tsubota et al 2003;Hedderson et al 2004;Stech 2004;Stech & Frey 2008;Stech et al 2012;Sim-Sim et al 2017), with palynological information on its species remaining rare (Hirohama 1977) or only briefly summarized in some taxonomic studies (Rooy 1992;Gradstein et al 2001;Allen 2002), in which they were described as "subrounded", "small", "apparently ornamented", "slightly papillose" or "having a smooth sporoderm".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%