2018
DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00116317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Clinical guidelines are traditionally drafted by expert consensus. The benefits of mammographic screening have been questioned in recent years, owing to biases detected in the clinical trials that popularized its widespread use. Meanwhile, growing body of evidence on harms associated with mammographic screening also required a new approach, taking into account the uncertainties on the benefits and a balance between the gains and possible harms from screening. This article discusses the development of the new g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
26
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The detailed methods for definition of the scope, research questions, search strategies, selection of studies, evaluation of the quality of evidence, and formulation of recommendations in the guidelines have been published elsewhere 8,9 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The detailed methods for definition of the scope, research questions, search strategies, selection of studies, evaluation of the quality of evidence, and formulation of recommendations in the guidelines have been published elsewhere 8,9 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recommendations do not refer to the population at high risk of developing breast cancer. For early diagnosis we evaluated strategies of awareness of suspicious signs and symptoms for breast cancer, clinical criteria for identifying suspected cases in primary health care and the diagnostic confirmation in a single health care unit 9 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations