2013
DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00115413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Produção científica: avaliação da qualidade ou ficção contábil?

Abstract: Quality assessment of scientific output is based extensively (if not exclusively) on quantitative bibliometric indicators, despite mounting criticism. The reaction by the academic community has increased in recent years. After presenting a critical evaluation of this model, the article presents an alternative qualitative model oriented towards removing the excessive stimulus for the unbridled production of articles that make a dubious contribution to science. Criticism of the proposed model is presented and di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is not part of the scope of this study to discuss the country's current model of scientific production and the form of assessment of its quality, which has been done by other actors 9,19,20 , these two aspects have a fundamental role in the present discussion and require minimum description. In Brazil the production of scientific knowledge is concentrated in the public university, especially in graduate programs, incentivized by Capes and sponsored by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientí-fico e Tecnológico (CNPq, National Council for Scientific and Technological Development), in addition to regional support from state researchsponsoring agencies.…”
Section: Approximation With Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is not part of the scope of this study to discuss the country's current model of scientific production and the form of assessment of its quality, which has been done by other actors 9,19,20 , these two aspects have a fundamental role in the present discussion and require minimum description. In Brazil the production of scientific knowledge is concentrated in the public university, especially in graduate programs, incentivized by Capes and sponsored by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientí-fico e Tecnológico (CNPq, National Council for Scientific and Technological Development), in addition to regional support from state researchsponsoring agencies.…”
Section: Approximation With Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assim, ele busca desconstruir uma tese que tem sido defendida por autores de diversas áreas do conhecimento no Brasil (DE MEIS et al 2003;RODRIGUES, 2007;SGUISSARDI;SILVA JR., 2009;TREIN;RODRIGUES, 2011;SCHMIDT, 2011;GODOI;XAVIER, 2012;VILAÇA;PALMA, 2013;CAMARGO JR., 2013;VAZ, 2013;REGO, 2014;BIANCHETTI;VALLE, 2014), mas noutros contextos também (ROLAND, 2007;FANELLI, 2010;YOUNG;IOANNIDIS;AL-UBAYDLI, 2008;QIU, 2010). No caso brasileiro, muitos autores que esposam tal tese identificam que uma das causas fundamentais do fenômeno contemporâneo do produtivismo é o modelo de avaliação praticado pela Capes.…”
Section: )unclassified
“…This controversy is not a new one, and there is an extensive amount of international scientific literature on the issue. A good example of how these objections converge and persist is the debate over the Brazilian context -published in the September 2013 edition of Cadernos de Saúde Pública -regarding Keneth Rochel de Camargo Jr. 's article, which preaches ending rankings in favor of a qualitative assessment (CAMARGO JR, 2013). Similarly, a study published in 2012, regarding the results of a survey conducted with over 1,700 researchers from 84 countries who have at least one article in the JCR, reveals that about 90% of them believe that the impact factor is important or very important for evaluating scientific performance in their countries, and that their attitude toward the impact factor is ambivalent (BUELA-CASAL; ZYCH, 2012).…”
Section: About Bibliographic Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%