The role of the State in fostering innovation activity: case studies of the USA and Germany

Gordon, José Luis

doi:10.1590/0101-31572019-2899

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 12 publications

(28 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Just severe illnesses are considered the cause of dismissal, which makes the right subjective and creates tensions between boss and employee; there is no guarantee of employment for the employee returning from leave (although retaliatory dismissals may be questioned in court against the discrimination argument). These rules apply to workers in the private sector and public servants, although they generally manage to negotiate more favorable conditions in collective bargaining with the public administration (Gordon, 2019).…”

Section: Usa Legislationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Brazil, USA, and Germany: A comparison of legislation in the fight against COVID-19

Silva

Garcia

Nääs

2021

RSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article compares Brazil, the United States, and Germany's laws in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, describing the scenario of these laws, comparing them to evaluate which country had the best performance, in their laws concerning the COVID-19, in the face of the international requirements. The primary laws of Brazil, the USA, and Germany were used, comparing WHO requirements and international requirements, analyzing: speed in the isolation decision; assembly of hospitals and equipment; economic measures for the population; organization of states and international negotiation. The comparison system established was based on scores (scores), with scores ranging from 1 to 5 (very poor to very good) depending on the existence of legislation for each country (Brazil, USA, and Germany), for each type of requirement, concerning the level of awareness of the norm's applicator to the problems faced in the pandemic. Although some nations have acted quickly in imposing restrictions and recommending social isolation, they have been hampered by economic, social, and political factors.

show abstract

Section: Usa Legislationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(FGV, 2020). In Germany, spending reached about R $ 4.4 trillion, or 37% of GDP (Gordon, 2019). Spain and the United Kingdom even involved 17% of GDP in dealing with the crisis, data referring to the first half of 2020 (FGV, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Brazil, USA, and Germany: A comparison of legislation in the fight against COVID-19

Silva

Garcia

Nääs

2021

RSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Statistical Analysis of Government Impact on the Development of Innovation Activities

Shubin¹,

Antokhin²

2021

EPI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is devoted to the analysis of state instruments of influence on the internal innovation environment and the identification of statistical patterns in the development of innovative activity in Russia. To identify patterns, official statistical indicators, given on the website of the Federal State Statistics Service, as well as data from foreign research publications were used. The analysis of the four main functions of state influence on innovation activity is carried out and the main methods of state regulation in the area under consideration are identified. An analysis of the dynamic changes in the costs of innovation in Russia, both in current and basic prices, indicates a positive trend in the change in the amount of funds allocated to the country's innovation sector. The article also tests the hypothesis of the relationship between the volume of shipped innovative products in a particular entity and the volume of costs for innovative activities.

show abstract

Comparison of Innovation Policies Between the European Union and the United States of America

Pires

2022

Impact of Open Innovation on the World Economy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Innovation policies of the United States of America (USA) seem to be more effective and efficient than the innovation policies of the European Union (EU). In this work, a brief review about the innovation policies of the two regions is carried out, followed by their comparison and critical discussion. Unequivocally, the innovation policies of USA and EU support open innovation. In general, open innovation strategies lead to better economic performance, the growth of the number of jobs, and workers' better remunerations and quality of life than close innovation strategies. Both USA and EU recognize the importance of innovation to overcome the current pandemic crisis. In contrast with the innovation policies of EU, the innovation policies of USA support a higher investment in research and development (R&D), a more flexible regulation in some areas (e.g., copyright), and more coordinated agencies for the transposition of the laboratory inventions to the market (“Lab-to-Market”). This seems to contribute to a less fragmented market and a more effective promotion and marketing of new inventions in USA.

show abstract

The role of the State in fostering innovation activity: case studies of the USA and Germany

Cited by 4 publications

References 12 publications

Brazil, USA, and Germany: A comparison of legislation in the fight against COVID-19

Brazil, USA, and Germany: A comparison of legislation in the fight against COVID-19

Statistical Analysis of Government Impact on the Development of Innovation Activities

Comparison of Innovation Policies Between the European Union and the United States of America

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About