A series of editorials regarding the question: why is my paper rejected?

Abstract

A uthors frequently ask themselves and others, the reason(s) why a manuscript has been rejected, especially, when it has not been sent to peer-review (the

A year later

“…For the latter, whatever is published in journal X or Y that has an "impact factor" is enough. Once again, it is fundamental to acknowledge the role of the scientific method 10 , justifying the efficacious translation of its principles. On the other hand, the speed of knowledge translation has been high, particularly when sensationalist and "in fashion" topics are covered, to the detriment of those of utmost importance to the spreading of adequate data interpretation.…”