2017
DOI: 10.1590/0100-69912017002012
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Objective: to evaluate local and systemic recurrence of breast cancer in patients submitted to autologous fat grafting in the immediate reconstruction after conservative surgery for breast cancer. Methods: this is a historical cohort study comparing 167 patients submitted to conservative surgery without reconstruction (conservative surgery group) with 27 patients submitted to conservative treatment with immediate graft reconstruction, following the Coleman's technique (lipofilling group). All patients had i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional meta-analysis of the remaining unmatched cohorts 26,40,42,44,47,49,61,68,71 was possible only for the IRD of LRR for period C, as control subjects did not have a disease-free interval (period A) equivalent to that in the AFT group. The overall IRD was -0⋅27 (-0⋅43 to -0⋅11) per cent per year, with a significantly lower overall LRR rate among patients who had AFT (P = 0⋅004).…”
Section: Results Of Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Additional meta-analysis of the remaining unmatched cohorts 26,40,42,44,47,49,61,68,71 was possible only for the IRD of LRR for period C, as control subjects did not have a disease-free interval (period A) equivalent to that in the AFT group. The overall IRD was -0⋅27 (-0⋅43 to -0⋅11) per cent per year, with a significantly lower overall LRR rate among patients who had AFT (P = 0⋅004).…”
Section: Results Of Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gale et al 32 Krastev Fertsch et al 31 Gale et al 32 26 Kim et al 40 Kronowitz et al 42 Laporta et al 44 Masia et al 47 Mestak et al 50 Pinell-White et al 61 Seth et al 68 Stumpf et al 71 Mestak et al 49 Stumpf et al 71 RE model (I 2 = 41·00%)…”
Section: Re Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another 229 articles were excluded as duplicates and/or lacking LRR or control data. Finally, 11 cohort studies of 5550 patients were deemed eligible for this meta‐analysis 10,12‐21 . The sample sizes ranging from 40 to 1389, and the articles were published between 2011 and 2017.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%