“…As a noninvasive method for diagnosing chondral lesions, MRI has produced varied and controversial results, those results being heavily dependent on the type of sequence used, field strength, degree of chondral injury and level of experience of the examiner. Another important point is that MRI can be used not only in the diagnosis and classification of chondral lesions but also in the evaluation of the repair process and postoperative evolution of such lesions ( 4 ) . It has been known for more than a decade that 3.0 T scanners perform better than do 1.5 T scanners, which in turn perform better than do those with even lower magnetic fields strength ( 5 ) .…”