2018
DOI: 10.1590/0100-29452018202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOURCES OF RESISTANCE TO Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.cubense IN BANANA GERMPLASM

Abstract: Fusarium wilt (syn= Panama disease), caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense (FOC), is one of the most destructive diseases of banana, being genetic resistance the main management strategy for this disease. Since the pathogen is constantly evolving to supplant the genetic resistance, new sources of resistance must be investigated by genetic improvement programs aiming to developing new varieties. The objective of the present study was to identify sources of resistance from the different accessions maintain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten out of 18 (* 55.6%) of the diploids evaluated were classified as either highly resistant or resistant and the tetraploid (Monyet) was grouped as resistant. The results reported in this study are in agreement with those reported by Uma et al 2011and Ribeiro et al (2017) where the authors reported that diploid banana accessions they assessed were resistant to most of the pests and diseases tested. A study by Kumar et al (2009) also found a majority (4/7 synthetic diploids and 4/6 diploid parents) of the diploid banana cultivars to be resistant to Foc race 1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ten out of 18 (* 55.6%) of the diploids evaluated were classified as either highly resistant or resistant and the tetraploid (Monyet) was grouped as resistant. The results reported in this study are in agreement with those reported by Uma et al 2011and Ribeiro et al (2017) where the authors reported that diploid banana accessions they assessed were resistant to most of the pests and diseases tested. A study by Kumar et al (2009) also found a majority (4/7 synthetic diploids and 4/6 diploid parents) of the diploid banana cultivars to be resistant to Foc race 1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The advanced yellowing of these genotypes may not be associated with Fusarium wilt infection since they had lower RDI values or no rhizome discoloration, but is possibly associated with mineral deficiency and/ or excessive water. Ribeiro et al (2017) reported that a plant can show external characteristics such as advanced yellowing (high LSI) due to nutritional deficiency and excess water, but internally may not exhibit rhizome discoloration (high RDI). According to Li et al (2015), Foc can cause internal corm discoloration without causing any external symptoms such as yellowing of leaves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the use of resistant cultivars is the most efficient way to control FW (Li et al 2013;Costa et al 2015;Haddad et al 2018). Banana genotypes have been evaluated via the banana breeding program of Embrapa in Brazil to detect genotypes resistant to the pathogens among diploid accessions with an appropriate level of genetic variability, such as M53, Jaran, Birmanie, Pipit, and Malaccensis and between the Figo type and Silver type genotypes with Foc race 1 resistance alleles (Silva et al 2011;Rebouças et al 2018;Ribeiro et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, NARITA 12 was partially resistant to Foc race 1, but its parents 1201 K-1 (Nakawere x Calcutta 4) and 9128-3 (Tjau Lagada x Pisang Lilin) are resistant [ 40 ]. Nakawere (Matooke), Calcutta 4, Tjau Lagada and Pisang Lilin are all bananas known to be resistant to Foc race 1 [ 31 , 47 , 48 ]. Although the Matooke cultivars are resistant to Foc race 1 and potentially to Foc tropical race 4 (TR4) [ 31 , 32 ], this study indicated that their hybrids can lose resistance following conventional breeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%