2015
DOI: 10.1590/0034-7612116774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Governança judicial é um conceito multifacetado, pouco explorado na literatura, e são raros os estudos desse tema com dados empíricos que analisem as variáveis que o influenciam. Este artigo tem como objetivo propor um modelo teórico-metodológico de governança judicial, cuja aplicação futura permita a coleta de dados para descrever e avaliar a validade da relação entre os construtos e variáveis que o compõem em cada contexto. Premissas da teoria da agência e da teoria de custos de transação, dirigidas original… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Conforme mencionado na seção 2.2, considerando a revisão da literatura, bem como a análise documental da legislação pertinente, recorreu-se -para elaborar a definição constitutiva do construto a ser medido no instrumento em construção -à definição de governança (Hufty, 2011), de governança pública (Osborne, 2010;Akutsu;Guimarães, 2015) e de governança educacional (Ostrom, 2010;Osborne, 2010;Honig, 2006;Peters, 2012). As definições constitutivas do processo, isto é, os conceitos de cada uma das dimensões do modelo GAF foram aquelas consolidadas na Figura 1 (cf.…”
Section: Metodologiaunclassified
“…Conforme mencionado na seção 2.2, considerando a revisão da literatura, bem como a análise documental da legislação pertinente, recorreu-se -para elaborar a definição constitutiva do construto a ser medido no instrumento em construção -à definição de governança (Hufty, 2011), de governança pública (Osborne, 2010;Akutsu;Guimarães, 2015) e de governança educacional (Ostrom, 2010;Osborne, 2010;Honig, 2006;Peters, 2012). As definições constitutivas do processo, isto é, os conceitos de cada uma das dimensões do modelo GAF foram aquelas consolidadas na Figura 1 (cf.…”
Section: Metodologiaunclassified
“…Therefore, judicial governance needs to be understood from its own characteristics, different from those that apply enterprises and public administration in general, or even as a "tool for the democratization of the judiciary" (Tavares & Barbosa, 2016, p. 45). Emerging efforts on the topic in the field of management were summarized by Akutsu and Guimarães (2015) who suggested five dimensions of judicial governance: judicial performance; judicial independence; accountability and strategic resources of the judiciary; accessibility to justice; and structure of the judiciary. These authors also propose three levels of analysis to study judicial governance: institutional, organizational, and individual, with the goal of improving performance standards (Akutsu & Guimarães, 2015).…”
Section: Governance In the Context Of Courtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging efforts on the topic in the field of management were summarized by Akutsu and Guimarães (2015) who suggested five dimensions of judicial governance: judicial performance; judicial independence; accountability and strategic resources of the judiciary; accessibility to justice; and structure of the judiciary. These authors also propose three levels of analysis to study judicial governance: institutional, organizational, and individual, with the goal of improving performance standards (Akutsu & Guimarães, 2015). Their approach to judicial governance makes important points.…”
Section: Governance In the Context Of Courtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches are useful, for example, for research related to governance and performance of courts and other justice system organizations. Guimaraes et al (2011); Akutsu and Guimaraes (2015), Gomes et al (2016); Sousa and Guimaraes (2017) and Gomes et al (2017) have all applied these theories in research into judicial administration.…”
Section: Theoretical Lenses and The Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%