2015
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20150133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive deficits in post-stroke aphasia

Abstract: The assessment of aphasics’ cognitive performance is challenging and such patients are generally excluded from studies that describe cognitive deficits after stroke. We evaluated aphasics’ performance in cognitive tasks compared to non-aphasic subjects. A sample of 47 patients (21 aphasics, 17 non-aphasics with left hemisphere lesions and 9 non-aphasics with right hemisphere lesions) performed cognitive tasks (attention, verbal and visual memory, executive functions, visuospatial skills and praxis). Aphasic pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(24 reference statements)
2
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some patients in the SAH group did not present aphasic characteristics, the poor performance of patients with aphasia promoted a decrease in the mean of this group. This poor verbal fluency performance corroborates the findings of a recent study that showed a decrease in the performance of aphasic individuals compared with that of a control group in the tasks of verbal fluency and memory (26) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although some patients in the SAH group did not present aphasic characteristics, the poor performance of patients with aphasia promoted a decrease in the mean of this group. This poor verbal fluency performance corroborates the findings of a recent study that showed a decrease in the performance of aphasic individuals compared with that of a control group in the tasks of verbal fluency and memory (26) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Overt dementia syndrome with patients showing dependence in activities of daily living, not due to motor deficit, was also considered among the relevant variables. If cognition was not feasibly accessible (due to aphasia), the subject was considered not having it, as long as they maintained independence in activities of daily living and did not perform poorly on an executive function test such as the trail making test [14] (also routinely evaluated at our rehabilitation program). Bladder (incontinence or retention) and bowel (constipation or incontinence) dysfunction after stroke were also assessed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MD network might be especially plastic in this way, given that it flexibly supports diverse behaviors and modulates its responses based on current task demands (e.g., Freedman et al, 2001;Cromer et al, 2010;Jackson et al, 2016;Kumano et al, 2016). Recent behavioral (e.g., Martin & Allen, 2008;Corbett et al, 2009;El Hachioui et al, 2014;Bonini & Radanovic, 2015;Villard & Kiran, 2016;Simic et al, 2017;Wall et al, 2017) and neuroimaging (e.g., Brownsett et al, 2014;Geranmayeh et al, 2016Geranmayeh et al, , 2017Sims et al, 2016;Meier et al, 2016;Stockert et al, 2020) studies have begun to suggest a possible role for the MD network in recovery from aphasia (see Hartwigsen, 2018, for a review). Related evidence comes from increases in the MD network's activity during language processing in aging (e.g., Wingfield & Grossman, 2006).…”
Section: Other Populations?mentioning
confidence: 99%