The configuration of the Brazilian scientific field

Abstract

This article describes the configuration of the scientific field in Brazil, characterizing the scientific communities in every major area of knowledge in terms of installed capacity, ability to train new researchers, and capacity for academic production. Empirical data from several sources of information are used to characterize the different communities. Articulating the theoretical contributions of Pierre Bourdieu, Ludwik Fleck, and Thomas Kuhn, the following types of capital are analyzed for each community: social capital (scientific prestige), symbolic capital (dominant paradigm), political capital (leadership in S & T policy), and economic capital (resources). Scientific prestige is analyzed by taking into account the volume of production, activity index, citations, and other indicators. To characterize symbolic capital, the dominant paradigms that distinguish the natural sciences, the humanities, applied sciences, and technology development are analyzed theoretically. Political capital is measured by presidency in one of the main agencies in the S & T national system, and research resources and fellowships define the economic capital. The article discusses the composition of these different types of capital and their correspondence to structural capacities in various communities with the aim of describing the configuration of the Brazilian scientific field.

Quem são nossos(as) mestres(as) e doutores(as)?

“…Sobre a configuração das áreas de conhecimento, é importante destacar que ela está relacionada, entre outros aspectos, à capacidade de seus pesquisadores em desenvolver conhecimento científico por meio da produção de teorias e tecnologias associadas às demandas nacionais, bem como de participar do direcionamento dos rumos das atividades políticas, científicas e sociais do país e, principalmente, para formar pesquisadores habilitados com fins de sustentar e desenvolver estas ações 15 .…”

Establishment of research-oriented hospital: an important way for translational medicine development in China

“…Health, the predominant concern in society (Barata et al 2014), calls for quick and effective medical applications of basic biomedical findings to benefit the patient, thus there is an increasing need for the integration of clinical research and biomedical research. Traditionally, clinical medicine focuses on patients, while medical science research institutions only focus on animal or cell.…”

Sugarcane and cancer, scientometrics, and phytoplankton dynamics of a beach in the Amazon

“…This resulted in an exponential increase of published papers (accompanied by a boost of periodicals) and, not rarely, led to the undesired side effect of scientific misconduct (e.g., Fang et al 2012, Barata et al 2014, Vasconcelos et al 2015. At the same time, there has been a constant search regarding evaluations of the scientific development in different countries, what has been done with the development and introduction of distinct scientometric indicators (e.g., Leite et al 2011).…”