2001
DOI: 10.1521/jscp.20.3.396.22302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Divided Self Revisited: Effects of Self-Concept Clarity and Self-Concept Differentiation on Psychological Adjustment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
121
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
7
121
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies were motivated by Bigler et al's (2001) suggestion that it may be necessary to examine other structural aspects of individuals' self-representations jointly with SCD in order to test the specialization versus fragmentation hypothesis in a more sensitive way. Specifically, Bigler et al (2001) proposed that the effects of SCD may be qualified by an individuals' clarity about his or her self-representations (Campbell et al, 1996). For example, it seems plausible that only individuals who have a high level of SCD and great clarity about their self-representations would be expected to support the specialization hypothesis.…”
Section: Recent Studies On Scd and Adult Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies were motivated by Bigler et al's (2001) suggestion that it may be necessary to examine other structural aspects of individuals' self-representations jointly with SCD in order to test the specialization versus fragmentation hypothesis in a more sensitive way. Specifically, Bigler et al (2001) proposed that the effects of SCD may be qualified by an individuals' clarity about his or her self-representations (Campbell et al, 1996). For example, it seems plausible that only individuals who have a high level of SCD and great clarity about their self-representations would be expected to support the specialization hypothesis.…”
Section: Recent Studies On Scd and Adult Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Rogers (1959), in his theory of personality and therapy, elaborated that a coherent and integrated self-concept is a sign of a mentally healthy and welladjusted individual. Similarly, Block (1961) described the person who lacks a coherent core self as an "interpersonal chameleon" (p. 392) who lacks a sense of continuity and may be plagued by a lack of self-integrity.To date, findings from an increasing number of studies support the fragmentation hypothesis and suggest that high SCD (i.e., low self-concept consistency) is indeed associated with poorer psychological outcomes, such as higher levels of anxiety, depression, and neuroticism and lower levels of self-esteem and indicators of positive psychological well-being (Bigler, Neimeyer, & Brown, 2001;Donahue et al, 1993;Lutz & Ross, 2003;McReynolds, Altrocchi, & House, 2000). However, these studies also have some limitations, especially when the (2006) have argued that the principal-components-based index that is usually used to assess SCD is less than ideal because it may "confound irrelevant sources of variance with true withinperson variability" (p. 513).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…18 It is clear that establishing a sense of identity and self is an important part of development, particularly given research findings suggesting that a clear sense of self predicts psychological adjustment. 23 Individuals vary in the extent to which their self-concept is ''clearly and confidently defined, internally consistent, and temporally stable'' and this has become known as self-concept clarity. 24(p141) Those with lower self-concept clarity also possess lower self-esteem, score higher in neuroticism, engage in more self-focused ruminations, and hold less stable self-descriptions over time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This perspective continues with studies that link higher levels of purpose in life with recovery from alcoholism (Carroll, 1993;Waisberg & Porter, 1994), positive self-image (Shek, 1992), higher levels of selfesteem, balanced affect, cognitive wellbeing, and better health (Coward, 1996), greater happiness (Lewis, Lanigan, Joseph, & de Fockert, 1997), psychological wellbeing (Bigler, Neimeyer, & Brown, 2001;Thoits, 2012), mature defence mechanisms and mature coping strategies (Whitty, 2003), higher levels of perceived mental and physiological health (Nygren, Aléx, Jonsén, Gustafson, Norberg, & Lundman, 2005), higher levels of hope and satisfaction in life (Bronk, Hill, Lapsley, Talib, & Finch, 2009), and better developed emotional responses in coping with mental stress (Ishida & Okada, 2011). In a factor analytic study, Compton (2001) found that purpose in life was associated with a range of different measures including: life satisfaction, happiness, positive affectivity, self-acceptance, existential well-being, self-esteem, and environmental mastery.…”
Section: Purpose In Life and Psychological Enquirymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…More recently, this perspective continues with studies that link lower levels of purpose in life with living with HIV disease (Lyon & Younger, 2001), higher levels of suicidal ideation (Edwards & Holden, 2001), higher levels of general anxiety (Bigler, Neimeyer, & Brown, 2001), higher levels of fear of death and death avoidance (Ardelt, 2003(Ardelt, , 2008, higher levels of depression (Heisel & Flett, 2004;Hedberg, Gustafson, Aléx, & Brulin, 2010), higher risk of suicidal behaviours (Wang, Lightsey, Pietruszka, Uruk, & Wells, 2007), higher risk of psychosis and psychotic episodes (Turner, Jackson, Renwick, Sutton, & Foley, 2007), and higher risk of addiction to substances (Martin, MacKinnon, Johnson, & Rohsenow, 2011).…”
Section: Purpose In Life and Psychological Enquirymentioning
confidence: 99%