Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
25
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, longer papers tend to cite more references (Abt & Garfield, 2002) and papers that cite more references tend to be better cited (Webster et al, 2009;Mingers & Xu, 2010;Rao, 2011;Bornmann, Schier, Marx, & Daniel, 2012;Robson & Mousquès, 2014;Ale Ebrahim, Ebrahimian, Mousavi, & Tahriri, 2015;Haustein et al, 2015; review of earlier work in Alimohammadi & Sajjadi, 2009). There is even evidence that papers with longer abstracts are better cited (Weinberger, Evans, & Allesina, 2015), possibly because more data-or idea-rich papers have longer abstracts, or just because longer abstracts touch on more points and are thus more likely attract reader interest. These various relationships make it difficult to determine causality in analyses of how manuscript length predicts citation frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, longer papers tend to cite more references (Abt & Garfield, 2002) and papers that cite more references tend to be better cited (Webster et al, 2009;Mingers & Xu, 2010;Rao, 2011;Bornmann, Schier, Marx, & Daniel, 2012;Robson & Mousquès, 2014;Ale Ebrahim, Ebrahimian, Mousavi, & Tahriri, 2015;Haustein et al, 2015; review of earlier work in Alimohammadi & Sajjadi, 2009). There is even evidence that papers with longer abstracts are better cited (Weinberger, Evans, & Allesina, 2015), possibly because more data-or idea-rich papers have longer abstracts, or just because longer abstracts touch on more points and are thus more likely attract reader interest. These various relationships make it difficult to determine causality in analyses of how manuscript length predicts citation frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…components of writing style so that each component could be scored with minimal subjectivity (Table 1). These 11 components broadly reflect the principles of clarity, creativity, and narrative structure and are considered either common ailments of academic writing, such as the overuse of acronyms and noun chunks, or common remedies to improve academic writing, such as signposting (1,3,7,8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the PLOS Computational Biology "10 simple rules" collection contains dozens of short articles focused on specific, useful topics (http://collections. plos.org/ten-simple-rules): rules for structuring papers (Mensh and Kording 2017), writing science (Pautasso 2013, Weinberger et al 2015, Zhang 2014, doing your best research (Erren et al 2007), advice for graduate students generally (Gu and Bourne 2007), and many more. I'd also recommend reading Stearns (1987) and the reply from Huey (1987), as well as Lawton (1992) and Smol (2016) for additional early career advice from a range of perspectives (see a summary of these resources in Table 1).…”
Section: (5) Build (And Take Advantage Of) a Strong Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%