1979
DOI: 10.1364/josa.69.001495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light emission by magnetic and electric dipoles close to a plane dielectric interface III Radiation patterns of dipoles with arbitrary orientation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
152
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
152
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The F j and G j are integrals involving Bessel functions containing the complete information about the imaging properties of the optics ͑inclusively the image defocusing͒ as well as the modification of the angular distribution of emission of the imaged dipole due to its electrodynamic interaction with the substrate. 11 In the present letter, defocused imaging is used for studying the angular distribution of emission of fluorescent CdSe quantum dots. Instead of assuming them to be perfect dipole emitters with one fixed orientation or with perfectly circular two-dimensional degeneracy, we will assume their emission to be a superposition of three perpendicular linear dipole emitters with differing emission intensity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The F j and G j are integrals involving Bessel functions containing the complete information about the imaging properties of the optics ͑inclusively the image defocusing͒ as well as the modification of the angular distribution of emission of the imaged dipole due to its electrodynamic interaction with the substrate. 11 In the present letter, defocused imaging is used for studying the angular distribution of emission of fluorescent CdSe quantum dots. Instead of assuming them to be perfect dipole emitters with one fixed orientation or with perfectly circular two-dimensional degeneracy, we will assume their emission to be a superposition of three perpendicular linear dipole emitters with differing emission intensity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has been shown by many authors before [e.g., Felsen and Marcuvitz, 1973;Chew, 1990;Lukosz, 1979] The current distributions of the various sources, corresponding to Figure 1, are summarized in Table 1. It is worth noting that as every arbitrarily oriented electric dipole can be represented by a combination of VED and HED according to its projection on the z axis [Lukosz, 1979], our independent treatment of the VED and HED actually covers all possible dipole orientations.…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…It is worth noting that as every arbitrarily oriented electric dipole can be represented by a combination of VED and HED according to its projection on the z axis [Lukosz, 1979], our independent treatment of the VED and HED actually covers all possible dipole orientations. As for the HED current elements, one can readily verify that ⃗ J ∥ = E ⃗ J ∥ + M ⃗ J ∥ and confirm, upon substitution of the following integral identities [Piessens, 2000] in the definitions of Table 1,…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] No far-field radiation is emitted along the surface and less than 1% of the radiation is emitted into the air normal to the surface. The far-field pulse is detected at the receiver dipole after it is internally reflected from the back of the 450 m thick SOS chip.…”
Section: School Of Electrical and Computer Engineering And Center Formentioning
confidence: 99%