1993
DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6101_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Interaction Anxiousness Scale: Construct and Criterion-Related Validity

Abstract: This article presents data regarding the validity and reliability of the Interaction Anxiousness Scale (IAS; Leary 1983c), a self-report measure of dispositional social anxiety. The IAS demonstrates high test-retest and internal reliability. Correlations with measures relevant to social and general anxiety document its convergent and discriminant validity, and it correlates well with measures of anxiety and interpersonal concern in actual interactions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
98
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The self-presentational model of shyness, which is based in a comprehensive contemporary social-cognitive theory, suggested that all cases of social anxiety or shyness do not arise for precisely the same reasons for all individuals, although the precipitating factors will involve concerns with how one is appearing to others (Leary and Kowalski 1995). In support of these assumptions, it was found that people with high motivation to seek approval and fear disapproval tend to score high in dispositional shyness (Leary and Kowalski 1993;Watson and Friend 1969), showing that fear of negative evaluation is an important cognitive component of shyness construct. Shyness was also explained by negative selfevaluations in that shy people tend to evaluate themselves negatively and hold a low sense of self-worth (Cheek and Buss 1981;Crozier 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The self-presentational model of shyness, which is based in a comprehensive contemporary social-cognitive theory, suggested that all cases of social anxiety or shyness do not arise for precisely the same reasons for all individuals, although the precipitating factors will involve concerns with how one is appearing to others (Leary and Kowalski 1995). In support of these assumptions, it was found that people with high motivation to seek approval and fear disapproval tend to score high in dispositional shyness (Leary and Kowalski 1993;Watson and Friend 1969), showing that fear of negative evaluation is an important cognitive component of shyness construct. Shyness was also explained by negative selfevaluations in that shy people tend to evaluate themselves negatively and hold a low sense of self-worth (Cheek and Buss 1981;Crozier 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…-Interaction Anxiousness Scale: Interaction Anxiousness Scale (IAS) [39] is a self-report measure on a 5-point Likert scale with anchors ranging from not at all characteristic of me (1) to very characteristic of me (5). It measures the subjective experience of anxiety associated with social interactions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mothers' shy and anxious characteristics were assessed via the Revised Cheek and Buss Shyness Scale (Cheek 1983;Cheek and Buss 1981) and the Leary Interaction Anxiousness Scale (Leary and Kowalski 1993). Given that many have argued that shyness and social anxiety are overlapping constructs (Hopko et al 2005;Turner et al 1990), an aggregate measure of shyness and social anxiety was administered.…”
Section: Maternal Shyness-anxietymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…''I wish I had more confidence in social situations. ''); previous studies have indicated that this is a reliable and valid measure of social anxiety (Leary and Kowalski 1993). The items from both scales were presented as a single questionnaire.…”
Section: Maternal Shyness-anxietymentioning
confidence: 99%