1958
DOI: 10.1177/002200275800200106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

51
1,743
2
134

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,605 publications
(1,930 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
51
1,743
2
134
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of the functional approach to attitudes is widely acknowledged, and the motivations underlying attitudes are intrinsic to almost every domain of attitude research (e.g. Cialdini & Trost, 1998;Eagly & Chaiken, 1993;Kelman, 1958;Plant & Devine, 1998;Dunton & Fazio, 1997;Petty & Cacioppo, 1986). However, with only a few exceptions (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the functional approach to attitudes is widely acknowledged, and the motivations underlying attitudes are intrinsic to almost every domain of attitude research (e.g. Cialdini & Trost, 1998;Eagly & Chaiken, 1993;Kelman, 1958;Plant & Devine, 1998;Dunton & Fazio, 1997;Petty & Cacioppo, 1986). However, with only a few exceptions (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…operationalised in terms of Kelman's processes of internalization, identification and compliance, (19) (20). They developed and tested constructs based around these factors which may be particularly significant in complex healthcare organisations in which many different players are likely to be in a position to influence the success or failure of the innovation, even if they are not involved in adoption decisions.…”
Section: Technology Acceptance Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical models for explaining the adoption of various kinds of technology have been rigorously tested and refined (Cheung, Chang, & Lai, 2000;Davis, 1989;Fulk, Steinfield, Schmitz, & Power, 1987;Kelman, 1958;Lee, Cho, Gay, Davidson, & Ingraffea, 2003;Malhotra & Galletta, 1999;Song, Parry, & Kawakami, 2009). TAM is a well-known model that indicates the importance of perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) in technology adoption.…”
Section: Teachers' Gis Usagementioning
confidence: 99%