2015
DOI: 10.1177/0019793914564967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Performance Work Practices and Core Employee Wages

Abstract: Past research has provided mixed evidence on the relationship between High-Performance Work Practices (HPWPs) and wages. Drawing from more than 1,800 interviews with the HR managers in a stratified sample of Italian manufacturing plants collected in 2008, the authors argue that the results are inconclusive unless the configurations of the HPWPs and the mechanisms underpinning employee involvement are taken into account. Their results show that HPWPs are associated with higher wages for core employees only when… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is supported by Ince and Gil [15], who exerted that in increasing horizontal communication among employees, it would affect employee performance in a positive way. Other researchers such as Kibe [22], Sgobbi and Cainarca [23] also postulated that there is a positive relationship between horizontal communication and employee performance. The researchers found that horizontal communication encourages learning and decision making at the lower level of hierarchy in the organization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is supported by Ince and Gil [15], who exerted that in increasing horizontal communication among employees, it would affect employee performance in a positive way. Other researchers such as Kibe [22], Sgobbi and Cainarca [23] also postulated that there is a positive relationship between horizontal communication and employee performance. The researchers found that horizontal communication encourages learning and decision making at the lower level of hierarchy in the organization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, both JER and JEL can improve job satisfaction through the enhancement of employee motivation and skills (Sgobbi and Cainarca, 2015). Motivating effects are often considered higher for JER than JEL because JEL merely adds ‘requirements at the same level’, whereas JER adds ‘higher level responsibilities’ (Grant et al, 2011: 420, 425).…”
Section: Je and Worker Well‐beingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various empirical studies have examined the relation between JE (HPWP or enriching job designs) and worker well‐being (Godard, 2004; Handel and Levine, 2004; Humphrey et al, 2007; Sgobbi and Cainarca, 2015). Although JE tends to be positively related to satisfaction in particular, the findings are mixed and depend on specific practices or job characteristics.…”
Section: Je and Worker Well‐beingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the empirical evidence of an association between an increased use of high performance and involvement practices and earnings is inconclusive (Sgobbi and Cainarca, 2015). While some studies indicate that such practices can lead to higher wages for workers (Applebaum et al , 2000; Bailey et al , 2001) a review of 20 studies by Handel and Levine (2004) concluded the majority of studies indicated no significant effect on earnings.…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%