1972
DOI: 10.1159/000143842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between facial protrusion and root length in the dentition of baboons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order for the variation in dental and skeletal tissues to be as coordinated as they appear to be, the tissues are either integrated during their development (for example, phenotypic plasticity, developmental linkage), or they are not integrated but each is independently under tight genetic control. The latter alternative, however, is unlikely given the amount of plasticity that has been observed in both the jaws (maxilla and mandible) and the dentition (Riesenfeld, 1970; Riesenfeld & Seigel, 1970; Seigel, 1972; Boughner & Hallgrímsson, 2008; Cobb & Baverstock, 2009a). In order for integration to work effectively both tissues cannot be equally plastic at any one time; one must have greater influence over the other (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order for the variation in dental and skeletal tissues to be as coordinated as they appear to be, the tissues are either integrated during their development (for example, phenotypic plasticity, developmental linkage), or they are not integrated but each is independently under tight genetic control. The latter alternative, however, is unlikely given the amount of plasticity that has been observed in both the jaws (maxilla and mandible) and the dentition (Riesenfeld, 1970; Riesenfeld & Seigel, 1970; Seigel, 1972; Boughner & Hallgrímsson, 2008; Cobb & Baverstock, 2009a). In order for integration to work effectively both tissues cannot be equally plastic at any one time; one must have greater influence over the other (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Siegel [45] found a direct relationship between the degree of facial pro trusion measured as palatal or mandibular length and tooth root length in the longfaced baboon Papio anubis. The anthropometric data confirmed com parative and experimental findings in rodents and in carnivores suggestive of a biochemical mechanism capable of transmitting changes in the ontogenetic growth rate of the facial skeleton to the roots of the teeth.…”
Section: Surgical Orthodonticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that relative root length of the teeth was short in short-faced dogs and long in long-faced dogs. Finally, it was shown [Siegel, 1972] that in baboons ( Papio anubis) in which facial protrusion varies, there exist significant correlations between dental root length and palatal length and mandibular length as well. Korkhaus [1929] was the first to demon strate that, while the crown and upper two thirds of the roots of human teeth are genetically conditioned, the morphology of the apical third of the root is strongly influenced by environmental factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%