2008
DOI: 10.1157/13114392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) in patients with advanced HIV-1 infection and blunted immune response to HAART

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An in vivo study using an immunocompetent BALB/c mouse model revealed that repeated application of rIL-2 significantly enhanced the antiviral effect of the low number of lymphocytes in several tissues, both in prophylaxis and in therapy (16). In a prospective cohort study on patients with HIV, CD4 + T-cell counts were observed to increase after rIL-2 treatment (17). Furthermore, a low dose of rIL-2 selectively modulated CD4 + T-cell subsets in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and markedly reduced the activity of the disease (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An in vivo study using an immunocompetent BALB/c mouse model revealed that repeated application of rIL-2 significantly enhanced the antiviral effect of the low number of lymphocytes in several tissues, both in prophylaxis and in therapy (16). In a prospective cohort study on patients with HIV, CD4 + T-cell counts were observed to increase after rIL-2 treatment (17). Furthermore, a low dose of rIL-2 selectively modulated CD4 + T-cell subsets in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and markedly reduced the activity of the disease (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunological discordance has been reported in 15-30z of patients who receive ART (15), and the risk factors for this condition are advanced age, low nadir CD4 + cell count, hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection, and poor adherence to ART (15)(16)(17)(18). There are several controlled studies regarding immunological responses in HIV patients using interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-7, some of which have demonstrated the effectiveness of immunotherapy (19,20). However, the benefits of immunotherapy remain unclear, and the United States Department of Health and Human Service guidelines have recommended that immune-based therapies should not be used unless in the context of clinical research (21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this issue of EIMC, Crespo et al 23 report on a cohort of HIV-infected patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy without a significant increase in CD4 count despite viral suppression below the limit of detection. In this study, patients with CD4 T cell counts below 200 who had received HAART for a median of nearly 5 years but showed no significant CD4 count increase for at least 12 months despite viral suppression to < 50 copies/mL, received low-dose, intermittent IL-2, consisting of IL-2 cycles (4.5 mIU once a day subcutaneously for 5 consecutive days) every 4 weeks with a planned goal of 6 cycles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%