2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01142.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nondestructive, rapid, reliable and inexpensive method to sample, store and extract high‐quality DNA from fish body mucus and buccal cells

Abstract: A rapid, nondestructive, reproducible and cheap DNA extraction method from body mucus and buccal cells of northern pike and brown trout is described. Buccal cells and body mucus were sampled on FTA Cards; the captured DNA was used directly for microsatellite and polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR–RFLP) analyses. A complete concordance with control DNA was found. The genotyping error rate for microsatellite ranged from 1.9% to 3.3% for the northern pike and brown trout, resp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike fish and amphibians, which release abundant extracellular DNA via body mucus secretion [17], crayfish and other crustacean species seem to release limited amounts of tissue into water, which makes them more difficult to detect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike fish and amphibians, which release abundant extracellular DNA via body mucus secretion [17], crayfish and other crustacean species seem to release limited amounts of tissue into water, which makes them more difficult to detect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the development of new technologies and tools allowing a hands‐off collection of DNA in the aquatic environment is suggested. Indeed, in the case of fishes, mucus (Livia et al , 2006) and scales (Yue & Orban, 2001) have already been reported to be suitable for DNA analyses, and, along with other sources of DNA ( e.g. faeces and urine), could be used in individual genetic tagging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now possible to extract enough DNA from many kinds of samples such as scales and body mucus, without harming the fish [13,14]. PCR-based techniques for sex identification using the sex-determination gene (SRY) or homologous fragments such as zinc finger protein genes (ZFX and ZFY) which are amplified together or separately have been used widely in many mammal species [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%