Proceedings 20th IEEE International Parallel &Amp; Distributed Processing Symposium 2006
DOI: 10.1109/ipdps.2006.1639415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The IEEE 802.15.4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
61
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In [11], a similar analysis is proposed for WBSNs, with a particular emphasis on the radio activity of the node. The works in [17] and [18] focus on the part of the IEEE 802.15.4 standard that works in TDMA mode, and propose two separate techniques to estimate the expected packet delay. However, none of the aforementioned network models propose an in-depth analysis of the application executed by the nodes, which is crucial to have a coherent global evaluation of the WSN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [11], a similar analysis is proposed for WBSNs, with a particular emphasis on the radio activity of the node. The works in [17] and [18] focus on the part of the IEEE 802.15.4 standard that works in TDMA mode, and propose two separate techniques to estimate the expected packet delay. However, none of the aforementioned network models propose an in-depth analysis of the application executed by the nodes, which is crucial to have a coherent global evaluation of the WSN.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, thanks to the nature of data compression that leads to a uniform output rate, a simple delay model (based on the one in [17]) can be formulated. In particular, the worst-case delay for a node n occurs when the remaining nodes use all their slots (and the control overhead for all the corresponding frames) before node n is enabled to transmit:…”
Section: Ieee 802154 Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Reference [11], the authors proposed the analysis of the GTS allocation mechanism for providing timeliness guarantees in IEEE 802.15.4 networks. While the work in Reference [11] evaluated the impact of the IEEE 802.15.4 parameters on the guaranteed bandwidth, maximum throughput and delay bound, the power-efficiency of a GTS allocation was not addressed. This paper extends the work in Reference [11] to capture the trade-off between energy-efficiency and delay guarantees of a GTS allocation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observe that in Equation (11) the guaranteed rate depends on the portion of time slot Tdata used for effective data transmission (without taking into account the overheads (IFS and acknowledgements)), which also depends on the frame size (and its corresponding IFS) and on the superframe order. In Reference [11], the authors have evaluated the maximum bandwidth guaranteed for one time slot GTS as a function of frame size and their corresponding IFSs. Figure 6 illustrates the guaranteed bandwidth per one GTS allocation for different superframe orders.…”
Section: Impact Of the Beacon And Superframe Orders On The Delay Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IEEE 802.15.4 Task Group (TG4) [2], together with the ZigBee Alliance [3], has developed an entire communication protocol stack for Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPAN) [4]. However, because the wireless communication of a railway is operated between sensor devices in poor environments such as high speed and much vibration, there may be a problem when IEEE 802.15.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%