1995
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/75.2.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuromuscular Coordination of Squat Lifting, I: Effect of Load Magnitude

Abstract: Relatively continuous changes in interlimb coordination occur when increasing the load lifted from an initial squatting posture. Changes in EMG relative timing partially corroborate the kinematic evidence for changes in coordination with load scaling. The results indicate the need for further study to determine whether the observed changes in coordination are beneficial or detrimental to the musculoskeletal system. Clinicians should evaluate performance of this task under a range of task conditions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With freestyle lifting, the reduction in whole spine angle with increasing lift distance occurred mainly in the mid thoracic region. These gradual changes in spine angle with increasing lift distance are consistent with other studies, which have found gradual joint angle changes when load was scaled in squat lifting, 23,24,26,27 distance was modified in freestyle lifting, 7 and fatigue was induced when squat and stoop lifting. 3,4 This study found that with changes of crate position and hence lift distance, the lower and mid lumbar angles remained very similar across the three lift styles at lift onset (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With freestyle lifting, the reduction in whole spine angle with increasing lift distance occurred mainly in the mid thoracic region. These gradual changes in spine angle with increasing lift distance are consistent with other studies, which have found gradual joint angle changes when load was scaled in squat lifting, 23,24,26,27 distance was modified in freestyle lifting, 7 and fatigue was induced when squat and stoop lifting. 3,4 This study found that with changes of crate position and hence lift distance, the lower and mid lumbar angles remained very similar across the three lift styles at lift onset (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This technique of marker placement has previously been used to successfully obtain spinal marker positioning. [23][24][25][26][27] Further reflective markers were located over the apex of the iliac crest (pelvis), greater trochanter (hip), and lateral condyle (knee). These marker placements enabled data to be collected from the mid thoracic spine, lower thoracic/upper lumbar spine, mid lumbar spine, and lower lumbar spine ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent post hoc analysis showed a significant higher level of coordination in descent phase for deadlift. These results were similar to data found by Scholz et al (1995), who detected different knee-hip relative phase values when lowering or lifting weight. Subjects in that study showed a small but significant increase in the phase lag of hip motion behind knee motion with loads greater than 45% of their estimated maximum lifting capacity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Many different methods have been described to analyze lifting outcomes, but past interest has focused primarily on the spine and lower limbs [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Lifting per se may also be an important performance measure, and the effects of strength training may have important functional implications, particularly in disabled elders.…”
Section: Liftingmentioning
confidence: 99%