2000
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.18.1536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re: Markers of DNA Repair and Susceptibility to Cancer in Humans: an Epidemiologic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transient binding of ADPRT to DNA breaks may serve a signaling role to initiate DNA repair reactions by recruiting other proteins (36). Previous studies showed that the activity of ADPRT in mononuclear leukocytes was significantly different between cancer patients and health controls, suggesting that its activity might affect the susceptibility to cancers (37). In the present study, we found that an increased risk of ESCC was associated with the ADPRT nonsynonymous SNP (Val762Ala), which is located in the sixth helix of catalytic regulatory domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transient binding of ADPRT to DNA breaks may serve a signaling role to initiate DNA repair reactions by recruiting other proteins (36). Previous studies showed that the activity of ADPRT in mononuclear leukocytes was significantly different between cancer patients and health controls, suggesting that its activity might affect the susceptibility to cancers (37). In the present study, we found that an increased risk of ESCC was associated with the ADPRT nonsynonymous SNP (Val762Ala), which is located in the sixth helix of catalytic regulatory domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism by which a cell of one type can provide information about the response of a cell of another type to genotoxic stress is controversial (Baria et al, 2000; Berwick et al, 2000; Hemminki et al, 2000; Dornfeld et al, 2001; Nersesyan, 2002). Peripheral lymphocytes from patients who developed a variety of solid tumors displayed a higher frequency of DNA damage than did lymphocytes from normal healthy volunteers when exposed to genotoxic stress ex vivo (Berwick et al, 2000; Shadan et al, 2000; Baria et al, 2001; Buchholz et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%