2019
DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giy163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A critical comparison of technologies for a plant genome sequencing project

Abstract: BackgroundA high-quality genome sequence of any model organism is an essential starting point for genetic and other studies. Older clone-based methods are slow and expensive, whereas faster, cheaper short-read–only assemblies can be incomplete and highly fragmented, which minimizes their usefulness. The last few years have seen the introduction of many new technologies for genome assembly. These new technologies and associated new algorithms are typically benchmarked on microbial genomes or, if they scale appr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weak hint for tetraploidy might be due to a whole genome duplication event early in the diversification of the genus. The N50 of 3.2 Mbp is in the expected range for a long read assembly of a highly heterozygous plant species which contains quite some repetitive sequences as others reported similar values before [49]. Due to regions of merged haplophases the total assembly size of 485 Mbp is smaller than expected for a fully phase separated “diploid” genome sequence based on the haploid genome size estimation of 322 Mbp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The weak hint for tetraploidy might be due to a whole genome duplication event early in the diversification of the genus. The N50 of 3.2 Mbp is in the expected range for a long read assembly of a highly heterozygous plant species which contains quite some repetitive sequences as others reported similar values before [49]. Due to regions of merged haplophases the total assembly size of 485 Mbp is smaller than expected for a fully phase separated “diploid” genome sequence based on the haploid genome size estimation of 322 Mbp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…A higher ploidy would result in more distinct coverage peaks as observed for a genome with up to pentaploid parts [29]. The N50 of 3.2 Mbp is in the expected range for a long read assembly of a highly heterozygous species as others reported similar values before [36]. Due to regions of merged haplophases the total assembly size of 485 Mbp is smaller than expected for a fully phase separated “diploid” genome sequence based on the haploid genome size estimation of 322 Mbp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Paajanen et al. () recently applied almost all of the methods mentioned above (with the exception of Nanopore) to assemble the Solanum verrucosum Schltdl. genome, and this could be used as a good benchmark reference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We demonstrate a high level of completeness of the assembly and identify a number of candidate genes for future analyses on evolutionary adaptations in cetaceans. Scaffolding with Chicago Library method (i.e., in vitro proximity ligation) has previously produced high‐quality genomes in plants (Moll et al., ; Paajanen et al., ), insects (Nosil et al., ; Wachi, Matsubayashi, & Maeto, ) and birds (Holt et al., ). We have applied this method to a sample from a deceased by‐caught cetacean specimen, demonstrating that this approach can be successfully used for nonmodel mammal species and samples of lower quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%