2019
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbz020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New approaches for metagenome assembly with short reads

Abstract: In recent years, the use of longer range read data combined with advances in assembly algorithms has stimulated big improvements in the contiguity and quality of genome assemblies. However, these advances have not directly transferred to metagenomic data sets, as assumptions made by the single genome assembly algorithms do not apply when assembling multiple genomes at varying levels of abundance. The development of dedicated assemblers for metagenomic data was a relatively late innovation and for many years, r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
109
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current methods of mining for cas genes in metagenome are based on the de-novo assembled contigs and binned genomes [6]. Assembling long contigs requires high coverage of the genomes so that the dominant microbes with low genomic heterogeneity and less repetitive regions are often more represented in de-novo assemblies [7]. Besides, the incomplete assembling of soil metagenomes generates shorter contigs, which makes cas gene annotation more problematic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current methods of mining for cas genes in metagenome are based on the de-novo assembled contigs and binned genomes [6]. Assembling long contigs requires high coverage of the genomes so that the dominant microbes with low genomic heterogeneity and less repetitive regions are often more represented in de-novo assemblies [7]. Besides, the incomplete assembling of soil metagenomes generates shorter contigs, which makes cas gene annotation more problematic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have proposed metagenomic binning as a culture-independent method to extract genomes from samples (Albertsen, et al 2013: 533, Pasolli, et al 2019: 649-62.e20, Tully, et al 2018: 170203, Wang, et al 2019: 48). However, one of the main pitfalls of metagenomic binning is that metagenomic assemblers struggle to assemble contigs of closely related taxa, especially if the organisms are found in low abundance (Ayling, et al 2019). With knowledge now that strain-level variation occurs in species of the microbiome (Lloyd-Price, et al 2017: 61-6), targeted culture efforts are needed to confirm that strain variation observed in metagenomic data is not simply due to assembler bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEGAHIT (version 1.2.9) [28], metaSPAdes (version 3.13.1) [29], Ray (version 2.3.1) [30] have been used to assemble short-reads into contigs. These tools were selected based on their popularity for assembling metagenomic reads [31].…”
Section: Assemblersmentioning
confidence: 99%