Gender approaches in the study of the digital economy: a systematic literature review

Abstract

The data and debates around the negative impact of online work for women’s work-life balance during the digital acceleration generated by the COVID-19 crisis have lent greater relevance to the study of gender and the digital economy. This paper sheds light on this complex relationship by systematically studying the research on gender in the digital economy over the last 25 years. The methodology used is a systematic literature review (SLR) of scientific works and policy papers across different social sciences from 1995 to 2020 in the Google Scholars and Scopus databases. The SLR has resulted in the creation of three samples on which a quantitative and qualitative analysis was carried out to evaluate the volume of the research, trends across time, gender approaches and study topics. The general conclusions indicate that gender approaches to the digital economy stem from a wide range of academic disciplines, and also that there is a lack of theoretical consistency about gender analysis. First, the paper provides an overview of the volume of works and an analysis of some trends across time. Second, it identifies the three main gender approaches applied to the digital economy: (1) the ‘feminist theory of technology and ICT’ approach; (2) the ‘feminist political economy’ approach; (3) the ‘mainstream economic analysis and women’s participation and labour in the digital economy’ approach. Moreover, it distinguishes eight main gender analysis issues within these three approaches. Finally, the paper concludes by identifying future developments for a feminist political economy framework for the digital economy.

Beyond the usual suspects: Invisible labour(ers) in futures of work

“…However, the intersection of gender and platform labour organisation can impact visibility in digital work. Furthermore, limited gendered analysis of the digital economy maintains women's status as largely invisible within certain labour platforms (Grau‐Sarabia & Fuster‐Morell, 2021; James, 2022). The following section adopts a feminist perspective to address digital sex work as a form of invisible labour in FoW literature due to being under‐researched and excluded from labour statistics (Henry & Farvid, 2017; Rand, 2019).…”

Measuring the digital inclusion of women: a poset-based approach to the women in digital scoreboard

“…Research on the digital gender divide and women’s digital inclusion can be divided into three main phases. Early feminist and gender approaches to the digital revolution were largely optimistic about the potential of digital technologies as a tool for empowerment (Grau-Sarabia and Fuster-Morell 2021 ; Fuster 2022 ). Women were considered as a ‘disadvantaged’ group that just needed support to reach a level of access to ICT in line with the population as a whole.…”